| 查看: 969 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
wojinjin金虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
【求助】多层膜反射率的计算
|
||
多层膜反射率的计算过程中，在第一个界面出射的光进入第二个界面时有个相位延迟，这个相位延迟在不同的课本上有两种表示方法，应该是说完全不同两种表述方法，有的书上是2*PI/lamata *n*d*cos(theta), theta 是折射角，lamata 是波长，而有的书上是除以 cos(theta),我认为是应该后者，各位虫友们发表下意见吧！ [ Last edited by wojinjin on 2009-9-10 at 18:48 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
332求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
348求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
305求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
一志愿北京化工大学材料与化工（085600）296求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
调剂310
已经有9人回复
-
本科双非材料，跨考一志愿华电085801电气，283求调剂，任何专业都可以
已经有8人回复
-
调剂求院校招收
已经有6人回复
-
085600 材料与化工 329分求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
求收留
已经有3人回复
-
0856求调剂
已经有14人回复
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
all these two expressions are correct BUT NOT THE SAME. (using your words) An incident beam line is divided into two parts, the deflected and refracted, at an interface between the media #1 and #2. Your expression of 2*PI/lamata *n*d*cos(theta) is the TOTAL PHASE DIFFERENCE between these two beam lines in the media #1, which includes two parts, the phase lapse of the refracted beam line in media #2 (=2*PI *n*d*/[lamata*cos(theta)]), and the phase lapse of the deflected beam line in media #1 (=2*n*d*tan(theta)*sin(theta)). Therefore, the expression of 2*PI *n*d*/[lamata*cos(theta)], which you found in some other textbooks, is only a phase lapse of the refracted beam line in media #2. Sorry for making you confused in my last post. [ Last edited by bote on 2009-9-13 at 08:22 ] |
7楼2009-09-11 15:31:41
2楼2009-08-18 19:18:50
3楼2009-08-20 00:46:34
4楼2009-08-22 10:09:20
5