| 查看: 1047 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
wojinjin金虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
【求助】多层膜反射率的计算
|
||
多层膜反射率的计算过程中，在第一个界面出射的光进入第二个界面时有个相位延迟，这个相位延迟在不同的课本上有两种表示方法，应该是说完全不同两种表述方法，有的书上是2*PI/lamata *n*d*cos(theta), theta 是折射角，lamata 是波长，而有的书上是除以 cos(theta),我认为是应该后者，各位虫友们发表下意见吧！ [ Last edited by wojinjin on 2009-9-10 at 18:48 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
提交了我也来说说感想
已经有11人回复
-
评审有感
已经有30人回复
-
青B发送上会通知了吗
已经有9人回复
-
西安交大新媒学院副院长用撤稿论文结题
已经有6人回复
-
论文撤稿了
已经有8人回复
-
博士申请
已经有7人回复
-
化学专业申博
已经有4人回复
-
河北省自然科学基金
已经有9人回复
-
某211大学教师把个人教师官方主页改成:我跑了我跑了我跑了!官宣跑路！
已经有5人回复
-
26/27申博自荐
已经有9人回复
2楼2009-08-18 19:18:50
3楼2009-08-20 00:46:34
4楼2009-08-22 10:09:20
5楼2009-08-24 10:22:25
freyalovers
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 370.8
- 散金: 415
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 71
- 在线: 40.9小时
- 虫号: 383583
- 注册: 2007-05-26
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
6楼2009-09-10 13:06:34
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
all these two expressions are correct BUT NOT THE SAME. (using your words) An incident beam line is divided into two parts, the deflected and refracted, at an interface between the media #1 and #2. Your expression of 2*PI/lamata *n*d*cos(theta) is the TOTAL PHASE DIFFERENCE between these two beam lines in the media #1, which includes two parts, the phase lapse of the refracted beam line in media #2 (=2*PI *n*d*/[lamata*cos(theta)]), and the phase lapse of the deflected beam line in media #1 (=2*n*d*tan(theta)*sin(theta)). Therefore, the expression of 2*PI *n*d*/[lamata*cos(theta)], which you found in some other textbooks, is only a phase lapse of the refracted beam line in media #2. Sorry for making you confused in my last post. [ Last edited by bote on 2009-9-13 at 08:22 ] |
7楼2009-09-11 15:31:41