| 查看: 1836 | 回复: 27 | ||||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
anbb1009金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
JAP 审稿意见下来了,希望木虫上的牛人多多指点。
|
|||
|
今天上午打开信箱一看,7月22号投到JAP的paper给出来了审稿意见。本人知道小木虫上牛人很多,希望多多指点。现给出审稿意见: Review Report: The investigation of “title***”is interesting. The authors calculated the**** and **** in the Wurtzite InGaN/GaN quantum dots, and present the dependence of****. However, there are many questions about the calculation and the results. A major revision is recommended. Specific points for the authors’ considerations include: 1. The material parameters for the calculation of Fd and Fb in Figs. 1 and 2 should be provided in the manuscript. In Figs. 1 and 2, Fd decreases with decreasing Lb, and Fb increases with decreasing Lb. More physical explanation is needed for the reason in the manuscript. According to the abstract and the text, the barrier width of 8 nm seems a critical width, but it should be pointed out that it is just for the material system of In0.1Ga0.9N/GaN. 2. All the parameters that appear in the text should be defined. ei31 and ei33 in Eq. 4 are not defined. Check all the parameters and make sure that they are defined in the text. 3. The authors performed calculations with varying indium compositions such as obtaining the results in Fig. 8, but never mention in the text how they considered the indium composition variation in the calculation. Varying indium compositions result in varying band gaps and varying material parameter values. The authors should tell how they performed the calculation with varying indium compositions. A clearer explanation for the results in Fig. 8 should then be provided. 4. The authors used x and y to represent material compositions, but also used them for x axis and y axis in Fig. 4. They are confused. Maybe choose different parameters to represent the compositions. 5. A, B, C, … are used to represent different curves in Figs. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8. It would be better to use the real parameters to represent the curves in the figures. 6. The English should be improved in the manuscript. 以上是审稿意见,希望大家能指点迷津.............本人没什么金币,若中散尽金币..... |
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
思维录 |
» 猜你喜欢
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有8人回复
26申博
已经有3人回复
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有22人回复
最失望的一年
已经有4人回复
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗?
已经有19人回复
请教限项目规定
已经有3人回复
基金委咋了?2026年的指南还没有出来?
已经有10人回复
基金申报
已经有6人回复
推荐一本书
已经有13人回复
疑惑?
已经有5人回复
9楼2009-08-15 21:26:31
special_y
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2470.2
- 散金: 450
- 帖子: 2097
- 在线: 101小时
- 虫号: 444626
- 注册: 2007-10-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 零件成形制造
2楼2009-08-15 14:10:38
longquan8297
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
木虫的称号也得到了。为什么 ...
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.02
- 金币: 4588.2
- 散金: 245
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1861
- 在线: 194.2小时
- 虫号: 749583
- 注册: 2009-04-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 色谱分析

3楼2009-08-15 14:10:45
anbb1009
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 555.6
- 散金: 100
- 帖子: 375
- 在线: 233小时
- 虫号: 644698
- 注册: 2008-11-03
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II :电子结构
4楼2009-08-15 14:13:20













回复此楼
