24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4001)
>虫友互识 (609)
>文献求助 (509)
>导师招生 (336)
>硕博家园 (197)
>招聘信息布告栏 (186)
>博后之家 (137)
>休闲灌水 (136)
>论文投稿 (129)
>考博 (107)
>基金申请 (85)
>教师之家 (79)
>考研 (65)
>论文道贺祈福 (54)
>找工作 (52)
>公派出国 (51)

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

anbb1009

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 555.6
散金: 100
帖子: 375
在线: 233小时
虫号: 644698
注册: 2008-11-03
专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构

[交流] JAP 审稿意见下来了，希望木虫上的牛人多多指点。

今天上午打开信箱一看，7月22号投到JAP的paper给出来了审稿意见。本人知道小木虫上牛人很多，希望多多指点。现给出审稿意见：
Review Report:
The investigation of “title***”is interesting. The authors calculated the**** and **** in the Wurtzite InGaN/GaN quantum dots, and present the dependence of****. However, there are many questions about the calculation and the results. A major revision is recommended. Specific points for the authors’ considerations include:
1. The material parameters for the calculation of Fd and Fb in Figs. 1 and 2 should be
provided in the manuscript. In Figs. 1 and 2, Fd decreases with decreasing Lb, and
Fb increases with decreasing Lb. More physical explanation is needed for the
reason in the manuscript. According to the abstract and the text, the barrier width
of 8 nm seems a critical width, but it should be pointed out that it is just for the
material system of In0.1Ga0.9N/GaN.
2. All the parameters that appear in the text should be defined. ei31 and ei33 in Eq. 4 are not defined. Check all the parameters and make sure that they are defined in
the text.
3. The authors performed calculations with varying indium compositions such as
obtaining the results in Fig. 8, but never mention in the text how they considered
the indium composition variation in the calculation. Varying indium compositions
result in varying band gaps and varying material parameter values. The authors
should tell how they performed the calculation with varying indium compositions.
A clearer explanation for the results in Fig. 8 should then be provided.
4. The authors used x and y to represent material compositions, but also used them
for x axis and y axis in Fig. 4. They are confused. Maybe choose different
parameters to represent the compositions.
5. A, B, C, … are used to represent different curves in Figs. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8. It
would be better to use the real parameters to represent the curves in the figures.
6. The English should be improved in the manuscript.

以上是审稿意见，希望大家能指点迷津.............本人没什么金币，若中散尽金币.....

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

请教限项目规定已经有5人回复
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写已经有8人回复
最失望的一年已经有16人回复
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗已经有33人回复
求助一下有机合成大神已经有3人回复
求推荐英文EI期刊已经有5人回复
26申博已经有3人回复
基金委咋了？2026年的指南还没有出来？已经有10人回复
基金申报已经有6人回复
疑惑？已经有5人回复

1楼 2009-08-15 14:03:20

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

anbb1009

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 555.6
散金: 100
帖子: 375
在线: 233小时
虫号: 644698
注册: 2008-11-03
专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构

引用回帖:

Originally posted by qzhang6568 at 2009-8-16 12:48:
楼主的状态应该是“Waiting for Revision"了，好好修改接受应该是没有问题了。
具体的意见由于专业不一样，别人是无法给你的。
不过你的这个JAP速度很快的，能否列出审稿过程分享一下。俺投的一篇JAP已经3 ...

恩，这篇文章做的比较新的...所以审稿人给的意见还是比较积极的，主要是一些细节的问题。我估计再仔细修改一下应该就可以发表了！个人觉得JAP的审稿人还是比较负责任的。这篇文章投出去一个多星期才被编辑部送审。应该是半个月左右就给出了审稿意见。估计楼上的这位朋友的那篇应该也快了。做多下个礼拜就会有回信的！耐心等你的好消息吧。。等文章接受了一定给出投稿历程和心得体会！再次谢谢各位虫友！