| 查看: 573 | 回复: 1 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
hubeiww木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
Chemistry - An Asian Journal审稿意见，修后能接受吗
|
||
|
Subject: Decision on your manuscript asia.200900229 for Chemistry - An Asian Journal 不知道修改后机会大不大 两个审稿人1个接受但需要小修，一个认为文章的中心思想（focus）应该转变他认为的，然后接受 改了再说，有同样经历的大侠给点意见！！ Dear Professor Jiang, Thank you for your submission of 29.06.2009 and for the above-mentioned manuscript. We read this with interest and asked referees for their opinions. We agree with the comments made by one of the referees that although your findings are interesting they do not represent a sufficient basis for publication of a Full Paper at the present time. If, on the other hand, you have in the meantime obtained new results and can make appropriate revisions that are pertinent to the referees' comments, we would be willing to reassess an appropriately supplemented manuscript. If you decide on this option, please explain in an accompanying letter which changes you have made (and, more importantly, which not, giving reasons why not). The revised version will be assigned a new registration number and date of receipt in our files and will be sent back to the referees. We hope that you will understand our decision on this matter, and we remain Sincerely yours, Dr. Peter Gölitz Editor Dr. Brian Johnson Deputy Editor |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
今年的WR进展到哪一步了？
已经有8人回复
-
时间戳他又来了
已经有17人回复
-
系统今天又提示维护了，估计离放榜不远了
已经有9人回复
-
产物和副产物价值比较
已经有4人回复
-
这个自发加氧反应的机理是什么？
已经有7人回复
-
J-J-W不为人知的一面
已经有19人回复
-
没消息就是被刷了呗
已经有14人回复
-
微信指数没变化，科研之友没阅读
已经有8人回复
-
这种情况还有戏吗
已经有11人回复
-
同事接到电话了，我却没有
已经有4人回复
2楼2010-03-23 22:36:10