24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者bagzqab766将赠送您 50 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

bagzqab766

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 663.2
散金: 9
帖子: 256
在线: 9.4小时
虫号: 5311229
注册: 2016-12-03
专业: 机构学与机器人

[求助] 投了SCI小修后被拒，想问下可以不可以发邮件给编辑申诉已有19人参与

刚开始给我的小修意见很好：“The referee(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the referee(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.”

但是小修后感觉重新外审换了一个审稿人：
“Unfortunately there are already numerous studies that use robotic equipment; mostly a robotic arm; to facilitate the use of the study of technology in educational and academic environments. A quick search of the IEEE database will give you a large number of references in this regard.
From a novelty point of view, your study does nothing more than insist on it, but it does not contribute anything new that modifies or improves what already exists.
In recent years, the use of IoT technology has been linked to these experiences, with which your paper does not contribute anything new in that sense either.
For this reason I must advise to reject your paper.”
我觉得我搞了半年时间，而且已经小修了，怎么会出现完全不同的审稿意见，想问下这种情况可以找编辑申诉吗？

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

1楼 2021-01-25 18:39:34

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

bagzqab766

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 663.2
散金: 9
帖子: 256
在线: 9.4小时
虫号: 5311229
注册: 2016-12-03
专业: 机构学与机器人

引用回帖:

19脗楼: Originally posted by 赂脢脰脻脢脟脮脜脪麓 at 2021-01-27 16:08:36
脮芒脰脰脝脷驴炉戮脥潞脺脦脼脫茂脕脣拢卢脧脿碌卤脫脷脭脵脮脪碌脛脡贸赂氓脠脣脰脴脨脗脡贸脕脣脪禄卤茅脛茫碌脛脦脛脮脗拢卢脰庐脟掳碌脛脨隆脨脼虏禄脣茫脢媒拢卢脝帽脫脨麓脣脌铆拢隆

脛脟脪陋脢脟脮芒脩霉拢卢脰庐脟掳碌脛脪禄脗脰脪芒录没潞脥脨脼赂脛脫脨潞脦脪芒脪氓拢隆

脛脟脪脭潞贸拢卢脦脪脭脷脡贸赂氓脢卤鹿脢脪芒脰禄脤谩脨隆脨脼碌脛脪芒录没拢卢脭脷露镁脡贸脢卤脭脵脰脴脨脗脡贸拢卢脠禄潞贸戮脺 ...

脪脩戮颅赂酶脰梅卤脿路垄脕脣脕陆路芒脫脢录镁脩炉脦脢脕脣拢卢脦脪脫茂脝酶潞脺驴脥脝酶隆拢碌芦脢脟脙禄脫脨禄脴赂麓拢卢脦脪鹿脌录脝虏禄禄谩禄脴赂麓脦脪脕脣隆拢隆拢隆拢脪貌脦陋脙禄路篓禄脴赂麓拢卢脭玫脙麓陆芒脢脥脭颅脌麓脨隆脨脼碌脛脡贸赂氓脪芒录没潞脥潞贸卤脽脨隆脨脼脥锚脕脣脪脭潞贸碌脛脡贸赂氓脪芒录没脥锚脠芦脧脿路麓隆拢隆拢隆拢掳娄拢卢脪脩戮颅脳录卤赂路脜脝煤脕脣隆拢隆拢隆拢脙禄脫脙拢卢脠脣脦陋碌露脵脼脦脪脦陋脫茫脠芒隆拢脦脪戮玫碌脙驴脡脛脺脢脟脪脽脟茅脭颅脪貌拢卢碌录脰脗碌脷脪禄麓脦碌脛脡贸赂氓脠脣脕陋脧碌虏禄碌陆拢卢脣霉脪脭脣没脙脟戮脥脰脴脨脗脮脪脕脣脡贸赂氓脠脣隆拢隆拢隆拢