| 查看: 1738 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者期待成长将赠送您 20 个金币 | |||
[求助]
求助大神，MDPI的materials审稿意见，在线等
|
|||
|
如题，各位大神指教，第一次投materials，一路审稿走来，磕磕绊绊，现在有两个审稿意见回来，不知道大家是怎么看出来审稿人的态度的（经常看到有的人说一个接受一个拒稿之类的），我把两个审稿人评价挂出来，大家帮忙看下 审稿人1 Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) Is the research design appropriate? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Are the methods adequately described? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Are the results clearly presented? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Are the conclusions supported by the results? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) 审稿人2 Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Is the research design appropriate? ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) Are the methods adequately described? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Are the results clearly presented? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Are the conclusions supported by the results? ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) 这个是审稿人评价都不高吗？第一个是拒了吗？看他的意见，对结果好像有质疑，第二个整体态度较好，补充几个说明和实验就好了，麻烦大家帮我看下，科研小白在这里谢谢大家了 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有9人回复
-
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有6人回复
-
今年春晚有几个节目很不错，点赞！
已经有10人回复
-
情人节自我反思：在爱情中有过遗憾吗？
已经有10人回复
-
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有5人回复
|
好好改，有希望，既然没拒稿，肯定编辑会针对你作出修改去判断。同时请教下，materials审稿是个什么状态，看得见吗？你需要上传扫描作者声明和所属机构声明吗？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2020-12-23 11:57:49
3楼2021-08-20 14:02:34
4楼2021-08-20 14:28:16
5楼2021-08-21 19:47:37