24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者期待成长将赠送您 20 个金币

期待成长

捐助贵宾 (知名作家)

突破自己、用心成长

应助: 151 (高中生)
金币: 18270.4
散金: 380
红花: 20
帖子: 5714
在线: 766.3小时
虫号: 1067239
注册: 2010-07-31
性别: GG
专业: 无机非金属材料

[求助] 求助大神，MDPI的materials审稿意见，在线等

如题，各位大神指教，第一次投materials，一路审稿走来，磕磕绊绊，现在有两个审稿意见回来，不知道大家是怎么看出来审稿人的态度的（经常看到有的人说一个接受一个拒稿之类的），我把两个审稿人评价挂出来，大家帮忙看下
审稿人1
                                                                                                                                    Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references?                   (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Is the research design appropriate?                                                                                                          ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the methods adequately described?                                                                                                 ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the results clearly presented?                                                                                                             ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results?                                                                                        ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
审稿人2
                                                                                                                                    Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references?                   (  ) ( ) (x) ( )
Is the research design appropriate?                                                                                                          ( ) (x) (  ) ( )
Are the methods adequately described?                                                                                                 ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the results clearly presented?                                                                                                             ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results?                                                                                        ( ) (x) (  ) ( )
这个是审稿人评价都不高吗？第一个是拒了吗？看他的意见，对结果好像有质疑，第二个整体态度较好，补充几个说明和实验就好了，麻烦大家帮我看下，科研小白在这里谢谢大家了

回复此楼