| 查看: 414 | 回复: 1 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[交流]
麻烦您帮我翻译一篇摘要。谢谢!
|
|||
| 在不考虑和考虑A和B所参与反应这两种条件下,分别得到了C随停留时间的演变规律。结果表明:当考虑A和B所参与的反应时,模拟结果与实际更为相符;D过程中会明显产生E、F、G,说明H的脱除有还原与氧化两种途径;当气体停留时间达到接近2.5s时,E和F被完全脱除,P浓度约为5×10-6;在2.5s到3s之间的时间段内,还存在少量的J和K,但到3s时,二者浓度已基本趋于平衡,此时P浓度约为3.2×10-6;M、N原子的浓度呈脉冲变化,但两者的变化不尽相同,N原子的浓度快速上升,达到了10-6量级。 |
» 猜你喜欢
全日制(定向)博士
已经有5人回复
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有10人回复
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法,现在跑or等等看?
已经有4人回复
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
参与限项
已经有3人回复
实验室接单子
已经有4人回复
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
求助:我三月中下旬出站,青基依托单位怎么办?
已经有12人回复
所感
已经有4人回复
要不要辞职读博?
已经有7人回复
monitor2885
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
队长
- 翻译EPI: 15
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.339
- 金币: 38700.5
- 散金: 147
- 红花: 22
- 帖子: 4943
- 在线: 2166.8小时
- 虫号: 701577
- 注册: 2009-02-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生态系统生态学
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
gnaguy(金币+15,VIP+0):非常感谢你!下次还找你翻! 7-27 14:04
gnaguy(金币+15,VIP+0):非常感谢你!下次还找你翻! 7-27 14:04
|
在不考虑和考虑A和B所参与反应这两种条件下,分别得到了C随停留时间的演变规律。结果表明:当考虑A和B所参与的反应时,模拟结果与实际更为相符;D过程中会明显产生E、F、G,说明H的脱除有还原与氧化两种途径;当气体停留时间达到接近2.5s时,E和F被完全脱除,P浓度约为5×10-6;在2.5s到3s之间的时间段内,还存在少量的J和K,但到3s时,二者浓度已基本趋于平衡,此时P浓度约为3.2×10-6;M、N原子的浓度呈脉冲变化,但两者的变化不尽相同,N原子的浓度快速上升,达到了10-6量级。 Considered two situations that A and B were involved in reaction and neglected the two participants, evolution regulations of C as residence time goes were obtained, respectively. The results showed that when considering A and B, simulation results are accord with actual case. Obviously, E, F, G were produced in D process. It indicates that two ways, reduction and oxidation, were included in the removal of H. When gas residence time reached close to 2.5s, E and F were completely removed, and concentration of P was about 5×10-6. During the period between 2.5s and 3s, there was a small amount of J and K. But at 3s, concentrations of both of them showed basically balance. Here P concentration was about 3.2×10-6, while M, N atom concentration changes in pulse. However, there were differences between the changes for them that N atomic concentration performed a rapid increase in 10-6 level. |

2楼2009-07-27 13:19:22












回复此楼