24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 412  |  回复: 1
当前主题已经存档。

gnaguy

金虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 麻烦您帮我翻译一篇摘要。谢谢!

在不考虑和考虑A和B所参与反应这两种条件下,分别得到了C随停留时间的演变规律。结果表明:当考虑A和B所参与的反应时,模拟结果与实际更为相符;D过程中会明显产生E、F、G,说明H的脱除有还原与氧化两种途径;当气体停留时间达到接近2.5s时,E和F被完全脱除,P浓度约为5×10-6;在2.5s到3s之间的时间段内,还存在少量的J和K,但到3s时,二者浓度已基本趋于平衡,此时P浓度约为3.2×10-6;M、N原子的浓度呈脉冲变化,但两者的变化不尽相同,N原子的浓度快速上升,达到了10-6量级。

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

monitor2885

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

队长

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
gnaguy(金币+15,VIP+0):非常感谢你!下次还找你翻! 7-27 14:04
在不考虑和考虑A和B所参与反应这两种条件下,分别得到了C随停留时间的演变规律。结果表明:当考虑A和B所参与的反应时,模拟结果与实际更为相符;D过程中会明显产生E、F、G,说明H的脱除有还原与氧化两种途径;当气体停留时间达到接近2.5s时,E和F被完全脱除,P浓度约为5×10-6;在2.5s到3s之间的时间段内,还存在少量的J和K,但到3s时,二者浓度已基本趋于平衡,此时P浓度约为3.2×10-6;M、N原子的浓度呈脉冲变化,但两者的变化不尽相同,N原子的浓度快速上升,达到了10-6量级。

Considered two situations that A and B were involved in reaction and neglected the two participants, evolution regulations of C as residence time goes were obtained, respectively. The results showed that when considering A and B, simulation results are accord with actual case. Obviously, E, F, G were produced in D process. It indicates that two ways, reduction and oxidation, were included in the removal of H. When gas residence time reached close to 2.5s, E and F were completely removed, and concentration of P was about 5×10-6. During the period between 2.5s and 3s, there was a small amount of J and K. But at 3s, concentrations of both of them showed basically balance. Here P concentration was about 3.2×10-6, while M, N atom concentration changes in pulse. However, there were differences between the changes for them that N atomic concentration performed a rapid increase in 10-6 level.
Retirement
2楼2009-07-27 13:19:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 gnaguy 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见