24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 884  |  回复: 22
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zhaosong6638

铁虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 大家帮我看下,我该怎么修改

Comments to the Author
Dear Authors,
I have reviewed the manuscript PB-09-0307 “Synthesis and Reaction Kinetics Model of Suspension Phase Grafting Polypropylene with Dual Monomers”.
The paper submitted is related to studies in an interesting field of polymer chemistry-suspension phase for synthesis of grafted copolymers. I recommend publication, but I suggest some revisions to understand.

1. I think the introduction should be rewritten to clearly understand your manuscript.
2. For validation, data analysis should be accompanied with statistical data such as standard deviation. How many times did you repeat the experimental work for each parameter? The series of data should be presented in an average and stated with standard deviation.
3. The relationship of Reaction Kinetics Model and Synthesis should be better described.
4. The references is not enough.

Sincerely,


Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
The manuscript under consideration is quite interesting from a scientific point of view. However, I have some remarks concerning the content and presentation of the results. 1) Authors should make clear the experimental conditions of the suspension polymerization reaction for preparing PP-g-MAH-St studied.
2) Authors have to correct the figures accordingly to the instructions for authors of the journal.
3) I do not really understand why authors consider that diffution of monomers and other agents occurs from liquid phase just into the amorphous phase of PP grain? I consider that additional investigation of grafted polymers by using DSC method can clarify this questions.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wsetcaoxue


zhaosong6638(金币+1):谢谢参与
参考文献一定要应用一些新的 档次比较高的  
好好修改下 应该没问题的
祝福楼主!
11楼2009-07-24 13:41:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 23 个回答

longwave

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)


zhaosong6638(金币+1):谢谢参与
呵呵,重新改写下文章
我什么都不说,路过看看!
2楼2009-07-24 13:23:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaosong6638

铁虫 (小有名气)

4. The references is not enough. 是不是要多写几篇审稿人的作者,怎么知道审稿人是谁呀
3楼2009-07-24 13:24:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

努力着

荣誉版主 (职业作家)

低调隐士


zhaosong6638(金币+1):谢谢参与
我只看了第一个审稿意见,觉得很好修改啊,没有必须要求怎么做,你根据他的要求认真的做些修改,然后搞个说明就行!审稿人写出这样的审稿意见是因为他没有发现文章有什么硬伤,又觉得直接录用不太合适,所以随便找些意见说说。

恭喜&Bless!
4楼2009-07-24 13:26:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见