| 查看: 4394 | 回复: 10 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
JBE初审被拒，请大家帮忙看下审稿人的意见 已有6人参与
|
|||
|
第一个审稿人：While this is a well-written paper, there are some fundamental concerns that I categorise under two major titles: theoretical and methodological. 第二个审稿人: This paper is interesting. However, below I have some specific comments that might help improve the paper. 第三个审稿人: The topic and the overall framework are interesting. The paper is well-organized and fairly easy to navigate. However, there are several issues that have severely undermined its contributions to the literature. 虽然拒稿是个很常见的事情，对于科研人来说但是还是有点伤心加失落啊。仔细研究了审稿人的意见，每个审稿人都提了六七个问题，但是总体评价似乎还算积极的吧？由于是第一次SCI，对于审稿人评语不是很明白，比如“well-written”“interesting”对一篇文章是哪种程度的评价？是礼貌用语吗？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有10人回复
-
2025年遐想
已经有4人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
-
自然科学基金委宣布启动申请书“瘦身提质”行动
已经有4人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2020-11-11 17:42:43