24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

狂处士

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 130 (高中生)
贵宾: 0.028
金币: 19416.9
散金: 1774
红花: 12
帖子: 2842
在线: 500.1小时
虫号: 706357
注册: 2009-02-22
性别: GG
专业: 污染物行为过程及其环境效

[交流] 稿件被拒，很郁闷，编辑的权力是不是太大了？？

本人投了一篇Environmental Monitoring And Assessment，审稿弄了五个多月，终于等到了意见，一个建议大修，一个建议直接接收，可是编辑直接给拒稿了，搞得我很郁闷。感觉编辑的权力是不是太大了啊？？大家有遇到这样的情况吗？各位虫虫给点意见，我该怎么办？？要不要写信给编辑部去申诉啊？？申诉的话有没有用啊？？还有编辑信中说修改后重投是客套话还是可行的啊？？

以下是编辑的信和审稿人的意见。
Dear **********,

We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript EMAS3999 "Organochlorine pesticides in the surface water and sediments of the Peacock River Drainage Basin in Xinjiang, China: a study of an arid zone in Central Asia".

With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, the Editors have decided that your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.
Below, please find the comments for your perusal.We urge you to consider carefully the comments and consider re-submitting this paper as a new submission. Please have your paper edited by an English language editor before re-submitting

With kind regards,
Journals Editorial Office
Springer

Comments for the Author:
Reviewer #1: Manuscript Number: EMAS3999
Water and sediment samples were collected from Peacock River, Xinjiang Province, China and the concentrations of selected OCPs were measured and their possible sources were analyzed. These data are important since the information in the region is lacking, and may be interesting among scientist communities. I agree this paper to be published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment with a major revision.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript presents a detailed study of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in water and sediment from a river in western China, where it is actually a prestine region. The has been little information about these toxic compounds in the area, and the presented data can be very useful in assessing the atmopsheric transport and deposition of OCPs to remote places. The samples were well collected with an excellent sampling strategy. The method was classic and with sufficient QA/QC measurements. The reported data was within the common ranges compared to other remote places in the world and China. The authors suggested that the OCPs in the region were all 'weathered' /aged ones, with source information provided. The manuscript was well written. I would suggest a derect publicition of it in EMAS.

[ Last edited by 狂处士 on 2009-7-23 at 16:39 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

职称评审没过，求安慰已经有20人回复
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿已经有20人回复
垃圾破二本职称评审标准已经有12人回复
EST投稿状态问题已经有7人回复
谈谈两天一夜的“延安行” 已经有15人回复
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦已经有4人回复
聘U V热熔胶研究人员已经有10人回复
求助文献已经有3人回复
投稿返修后收到这样的回复，还有希望吗已经有8人回复
三无产品还有机会吗已经有6人回复

个人主页：http://grzy.cug.edu.cn/chenwei。环境科学与工程专业，从事新型有机污染物（EOCs）及持久性毒害污染物（PTS）的环境（地球）化学及其健康效应研究

1楼2009-07-23 15:43:25

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

userful

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1055.3
帖子: 648
在线: 336.4小时
虫号: 239016
注册: 2006-04-06
性别: GG
专业: 环境

★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流

引用回帖:

Originally posted by 狂处士 at 2009-7-23 15:43:
Below, please find the comments for your perusal.We urge you to consider carefully the comments and consider re-submitting this paper as a new submission. Please have your paper edited by an English language editor before re-submitting

So it is not bad as you thought, it will be accepted after major revision. Come on!