24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2779  |  回复: 44
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

狂处士

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 稿件被拒,很郁闷,编辑的权力是不是太大了??

本人投了一篇Environmental Monitoring And Assessment,审稿弄了五个多月,终于等到了意见,一个建议大修,一个建议直接接收,可是编辑直接给拒稿了,搞得我很郁闷。感觉编辑的权力是不是太大了啊??大家有遇到这样的情况吗?各位虫虫给点意见,我该怎么办??要不要写信给编辑部去申诉啊??申诉的话有没有用啊??还有编辑信中说修改后重投是客套话还是可行的啊??

以下是编辑的信和审稿人的意见。
Dear **********,

We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript EMAS3999 "Organochlorine pesticides in the surface water and sediments of the Peacock River Drainage Basin in Xinjiang, China: a study of an arid zone in Central Asia".

With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, the Editors have decided that your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.
Below, please find the comments for your perusal.We urge you to consider carefully the comments and consider re-submitting this paper as a new submission.  Please have your paper edited by an English language editor before re-submitting

With kind regards,
Journals Editorial Office
Springer

Comments for the Author:
Reviewer #1: Manuscript Number:  EMAS3999
Water and sediment samples were collected from Peacock River, Xinjiang Province, China and the concentrations of selected OCPs were measured and their possible sources were analyzed. These data are important since the information in the region is lacking, and may be interesting among scientist communities. I agree this paper to be published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment with a major revision.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript presents a detailed study of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in water and sediment from a river in western China, where it is actually a prestine region. The has been little information about these toxic compounds in the area, and the presented data can be very useful in assessing the atmopsheric transport and deposition of OCPs to remote places. The samples were well collected with an excellent sampling strategy. The method was classic and with sufficient QA/QC measurements. The reported data was within the common ranges compared to other remote places in the world and China. The authors suggested that the OCPs in the region were all 'weathered' /aged ones, with source information provided. The manuscript was well written. I would suggest a derect publicition of it in EMAS.

[ Last edited by 狂处士 on 2009-7-23 at 16:39 ]
回复此楼
个人主页:http://grzy.cug.edu.cn/chenwei。环境科学与工程专业,从事新型有机污染物(EOCs)及持久性毒害污染物(PTS)的环境(地球)化学及其健康效应研究
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

狂处士

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

那么有申诉的必要吗??
个人主页:http://grzy.cug.edu.cn/chenwei。环境科学与工程专业,从事新型有机污染物(EOCs)及持久性毒害污染物(PTS)的环境(地球)化学及其健康效应研究
3楼2009-07-23 15:48:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 45 个回答

starcraft

金虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
如果稿件很多的话,这个决定一点也不奇怪
你说你要汽车要洋房,而我却只有一张破破烂烂,吱吱嘎嘎直响的床!俺的主页,没事来瞧瞧:http://course.zjnu.cn/autocad/
2楼2009-07-23 15:45:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

userful

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
引用回帖:
Originally posted by 狂处士 at 2009-7-23 15:43:
Below, please find the comments for your perusal.We urge you to consider carefully the comments and consider re-submitting this paper as a new submission.  Please have your paper edited by an English language editor before re-submitting

So it is not bad as you thought, it will be accepted after major revision. Come on!
为人民服务!
4楼2009-07-23 15:49:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sdsp

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

S

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

好好修改后重投,应该没有问题的,楼主加油
团结互助。Scienceisawonderfulthingifonedoesnothavetoearnone'slivingatit.
5楼2009-07-23 15:50:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考博] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +4 k0dTPqJtl0jt 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-15 04:45 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[公派出国] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 7lpolszZVXgi 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-15 04:41 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[考研] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 7lpolszZVXgi 2026-08-14 6/300 2026-08-15 04:21 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[找工作] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 k0dTPqJtl0jt 2026-08-14 4/200 2026-08-15 02:21 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[基金申请] 小木虫上这么多卖论文的,真有人买论文么?感觉没必要啊 +11 Tide man 2026-08-10 12/600 2026-08-15 02:12 by home3163
[基金申请] 各位道友,我要去昆明玩几天,回来见。 +7 Tide man 2026-08-14 8/400 2026-08-15 01:11 by arzu_hma
[考研] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 8/400 2026-08-15 00:16 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[教师之家] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-14 22:32 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +6 majunge000 2026-08-11 8/400 2026-08-14 14:44 by 医学老男孩
[硕博家园] 读博的好处 +4 lnee 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-14 10:20 by ahsoarli
[基金申请] filecode +15 documentary 2026-08-10 17/850 2026-08-14 10:08 by kissu88
[基金申请] 关于Filecode分析方法 +9 majunge000 2026-08-10 12/600 2026-08-13 23:20 by iwuli
[文学芳草园] 阿姨 +4 汪汪锅 2026-08-09 4/200 2026-08-13 19:43 by arzu_hma
[硕博家园] 一作与独作在应聘高校教师时区别大吗 +3 mbygzh 2026-08-08 4/200 2026-08-13 19:31 by 龙-樱
[基金申请] 静等基金结果 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-10 21/1050 2026-08-13 17:56 by 且听虎啸
[基金申请] 重要来源:本周末出结果 +10 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-12 10/500 2026-08-13 15:46 by likettle
[基金申请] 结合人工智能,周易传统文化,filecode打分制来了,3分以上希望很大。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 08:35 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +11 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 13/650 2026-08-12 08:17 by yufeiwaner
[基金申请] 国自然结果 +4 Vierhys 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 15:06 by Vierhys
[基金申请] fileCode有新解读? +10 Tide man 2026-08-08 18/900 2026-08-09 12:55 by 仁砚薪传
信息提示
请填处理意见