24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2672  |  回复: 13
【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 lllqqq1100 的 8 个金币 ,回帖就立即获得 1 个金币,每人有 1 次机会

lllqqq1100

新虫 (小有名气)


[交流] 投IEEE ACCESS,专家一个直接拒绝,一个拒接并鼓励重投,求各位给个指点。

萌新第一次投论文,结果是这样,不知道改咋办才好,心急如焚。下面是专家的审稿意见,第二个只有一句话,第一位的意见也不多。不知道接下来该怎么办,求指导。
I am writing to you in regards to manuscript # *******" which you submitted to IEEE Access.

Please note that IEEE Access has a binary peer review process. Therefore, in order to uphold quality to IEEE standards, an article is rejected even if it requires minor edits.

Your manuscript has not been recommended for publication in IEEE Access in its current form; however, we do encourage you to address the concerns and criticisms of the reviewers detailed at the bottom of this letter and resubmit your article once you have updated it accordingly.

Please revise your manuscript based on reviewers’ feedback and resubmit; elaborate on your points and clarify with references, examples, data, etc. If you do not agree with the reviewers’ views, then include your arguments in the updated manuscript. Also, note that if a reviewer suggested references, you should only add ones that will make your article better and more complete. Recommending references to specific publications is not appropriate for reviewers and you should report excessive cases to ieeeaccessEIC@ieee.org.

We highly recommend that you review the grammar one more time before resubmitting.  IEEE offers a 3rd party service for language polishing, which you may utilize for a fee: https://www.aje.com/c/ieee (use the URL to claim a 10% discount).

Please be advised that authors are only permitted to resubmit their article ONCE. If the updated manuscript is determined not to have addressed all of the previous reviewers’ concerns, the article may be rejected and no further resubmissions will be allowed.

When resubmitting, please submit as a new manuscript and include the following 3 files:

1) A document containing your response to reviewers from the previous peer review.  The “response to reviewers” document (template attached) should have the following regarding each comment: a) Reviewer’s concern, b) your response to the concern, c) your action to remedy the concern. The document should be uploaded with your manuscript files as a “Supplemental File for Review.”

2) Your updated manuscript with all your individual changes highlighted, including grammatical changes (e.g. preferably with the yellow highlight tool within the pdf file). This file should be uploaded with your manuscript files as a “Supplemental File for Review”.

3) A clean copy of the final manuscript (without highlighted changes) should be submitted as the “Formatted (Double Column) Main File – PDF Document Only.”

We sincerely hope you will update your manuscript and resubmit soon. Please contact me if you have any questions.

Thank you for your interest in IEEE Access.

Sincerely,

Prof. Zhouyang Ren
Associate Editor, IEEE Access
rzhouyang1108@163.com, rzhouyang@gmail.com

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Reject (do not encourage resubmit)

Comments:
The paper is about DC voltage control of photovoltaic grid-connected inverter based on improved reduced-order linear active disturbance rejection, after the review I have some comments.
- LESO is not defined,
- Cg is not included in Fig.1
- Table I, the value of ex is rms or peak?
- The simulation results are in discrete time, but the analysis and design is performed in continuous time. How to ensure the system stability?
- To support the propose is necessary experimental results.

Additional Questions:
1) Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: The paper gives a some novel ideas for reduced the dynamic effects of the disturbances (sag/swell in grid voltage, irradance fluctuation, temperature in PV panels) in DC voltage bus in a grid connected inverter. But is not indicated, how DC voltage desviation affects to Cdc capacitor.

2) Is the paper technically sound?: The analysis of the controller is appropriate in continuous time, but in the sections IV and V, the analysis and design process is mixed the continuos and discrete time.

3) Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: The paper shown the matter in a comprehensive way, but is too large. Is necessary reduce the content of the paper.

4) Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: The references are well.

5) Are there references that are not appropriate for the topic being discussed?: No

5a) If yes, then please indicate which references should be removed.:


Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: Reject (updates required before resubmission)

Comments:
The experimental analysis should be provided in this manuscript for a power electronic system.

Additional Questions:
1) Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes

2) Is the paper technically sound?: Yes

3) Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Partially

4) Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes

5) Are there references that are not appropriate for the topic being discussed?: Yes

5a) If yes, then please indicate which references should be removed.:

If you have any questions, please contact article administrator: Miss Sweta Satapathy s.satapathy@ieee.org
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jackyu2014

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)



lllqqq1100(金币+1): 谢谢参与
重投就是有机会。主要是回答第一个审稿老师的意见,按照审稿意见逐一回复就行了。
5楼2020-09-27 22:45:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dzf112233

银虫 (小有名气)



lllqqq1100(金币+1): 谢谢参与
据说是access没有大修,所以拒稿重投等于大修,重投还是很有机会的。不过电力电子期刊也不少,为啥要投access?
11楼2020-10-03 20:43:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lllqqq1100

新虫 (小有名气)


引用回帖:
11楼: Originally posted by dzf112233 at 2020-10-03 20:43:15
据说是access没有大修,所以拒稿重投等于大修,重投还是很有机会的。不过电力电子期刊也不少,为啥要投access?

想找个都觉得水的。。。因为自己确实没实力投很好的期刊,并且我们实验室没有实验,只能用仿真写论文。。哈哈
14楼2020-10-04 20:33:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
tzynew2楼
2020-09-27 21:40   回复  
lllqqq1100(金币+1): 谢谢参与
tepa20083楼
2020-09-27 22:04   回复  
lllqqq1100(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2020-09-27 22:29   回复  
lllqqq1100(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2020-09-29 18:22   回复  
lllqqq1100(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
yuekong7楼
2020-09-29 20:41   回复  
lllqqq1100(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
2020-09-29 22:11   回复  
lllqqq1100(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
psylhh9楼
2020-09-30 21:14   回复  
lllqqq1100(金币+1): 谢谢参与
nono200910楼
2020-10-03 00:47   回复  
lllqqq1100(金币+1): 谢谢参与
·
kakarote12楼
2020-10-03 21:06   回复  
lllqqq1100(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫IOS客户端
68041613楼
2020-10-03 21:10   回复  
lllqqq1100(金币+1): 谢谢参与
6 发自小木虫IOS客户端
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 lllqqq1100 的主题更新
提示: 如果您在30分钟内回复过其他散金贴,则可能无法领取此贴金币
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 欢迎211本科同学,过A区国家线,A区非偏远一本,交叉学科课题组 +6 lisimayy 2026-03-04 10/500 2026-03-04 22:56 by 还没学会飞
[考研] 环境调剂 +7 柒槿levana 2026-03-01 7/350 2026-03-04 22:00 by gwjxiaolang
[考研] 调剂材料学硕 +5 词凝Y 2026-03-02 5/250 2026-03-04 20:55 by hmn_wj
[考研] 274求调剂 +8 一个学习者 2026-03-04 8/400 2026-03-04 20:35 by kakakapanpan
[考研] 266求调剂 +7 哇塞王帅 2026-03-03 7/350 2026-03-04 20:30 by 一切OK
[考研] 295求调剂 +6 等春来, 2026-03-04 6/300 2026-03-04 16:11 by zhukairuo
[考研] 材料专硕290求调剂 +3 杰尼龟aaa 2026-03-04 3/150 2026-03-04 15:31 by syfwater
[考研] 325求调剂 +5 学家科 2026-03-04 5/250 2026-03-04 14:04 by kakakapanpan
[考研] 0703化学调剂 +4 G212 2026-03-03 5/250 2026-03-04 09:34 by 每天只摆一小会
[考研] 264求调剂 +3 thext 2026-03-03 3/150 2026-03-04 09:29 by 热情沙漠
[考研] 085600求调剂 +4 LRZZZZZZ 2026-03-02 6/300 2026-03-04 09:11 by 无际的草原
[考研] 一志愿东北大学化学314分求调剂 +5 lr1212.. 2026-03-02 5/250 2026-03-03 15:26 by xingtian2025
[考研] 材料工程专硕283求调剂 5+8 ,!? 2026-03-02 10/500 2026-03-03 12:01 by EBSD
[考研] 课题组接收材料类调剂研究生 +6 gaoxiaoniuma 2026-02-28 9/450 2026-03-03 09:27 by gaoxiaoniuma
[考研] 材料调剂 +3 恒顺自然 2026-03-02 3/150 2026-03-02 18:49 by L135790
[考研] 一志愿郑大材料学硕298分,求调剂 +6 wsl111 2026-03-01 6/300 2026-03-02 11:00 by ydudjddnd
[考研] 材料类求调剂 +11 wana_kiko 2026-02-28 14/700 2026-03-02 08:46 by 聪明的大松鼠
[考博] 26申博 +4 想申博! 2026-02-26 6/300 2026-03-01 17:32 by 想申博!
[考研] 0856材料求调剂 +4 麻辣鱿鱼 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-03-01 16:51 by caszguilin
[论文投稿] Optics letters投稿被拒求助 30+3 luckyry 2026-02-26 4/200 2026-03-01 09:06 by babero
信息提示
请填处理意见