| ²é¿´: 958 | »Ø¸´: 3 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õßcalos818½«ÔùËÍÄú 100 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
calos818ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
ÐÂÈ˲ËÄñ
|
[ÇóÖú]
Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÇóÖú£¬ÇëÎÊcarrier density distributionsÔõô»£¿ÊǵçºÉÃܶÈÑØ×Åz·½Ïò·Ö²¼£¿
|
|
|
¸÷λ´óÅ££¬ ֮ǰÉó¸åÈÃthe authors may want to add calculations using the marcus theory to intuitively give carrier hopping rates between two layers. ÎÒ½âÊÍÁËĿǰ¶Ìʱ¼äÄÑÒÔ´¦Àí»Ø¸´¹ýÈ¥£¬Éó¸å×îºóÒâ¼ûÊÇ¡°¡±I accept that Marcus theory calculations can be extensive and may be discussed in the future, while I still suggest the authors plot the carrier density distributions. The charge densities at CBM and VBM are useful enough without GW/BSE calculations.¡°¡± ÎÒ×öµÄ¶þάÒìÖʽᣬ¹âË®½â£¬´¹Ö±¶Ñ»ýÁ½¸ö²ÄÁÏ£¬ÓÃHSE06ËãµÄ£¬ ÇëÎÊÕâ¸ö£º¡° carrier density distributions¡±ÊÇʲô£¿ÊǵçºÉÃܶÈÑØ×Åz·½Ïò·Ö²¼»¹ÊÇÆäËûʲô£¿ ÎÒÒѾ»³öÁËVBM CBMµÄband decomposed charge density¡£ лл |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
085701»·¾³¹¤³Ìר˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
0817»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì319Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
»ï°éÃÇ£¬×£ÎÒÉúÈÕ¿ìÀÖ°É
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
274Çóµ÷¼Á0856²ÄÁÏ»¯¹¤
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
337Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÄÏÀí¹¤0805²ÄÁÏÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
£¨081700£©»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõ-298·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤304ÇóBÇøµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
NSFCÉ걨ÊéÀïÉêÇëÈ˼òÀúÖдú±íÐÔÂÛÖø»¹ÐèÒªÔÚÉ걨Êé×îºóµÄ¸½¼þÀïÃæÔÙÉÏ´«Ò»±éÂð
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©»¯¹¤´óѧ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤296·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211 ×Ü·Ö320Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹ØÉ̼ÒÍÆ¼ö: (ÎÒÒ²ÒªÔÚÕâÀïÍÆ¹ã)
calos818
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
ÐÂÈ˲ËÄñ
- Ó¦Öú: 11 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 3125.7
- É¢½ð: 77
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 1201
- ÔÚÏß: 730.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 698507
- ×¢²á: 2009-02-08
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔ II £ºµç×ӽṹ
4Â¥2020-09-03 14:38:36
zuocuiping
ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 14 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 5069.9
- É¢½ð: 966
- ºì»¨: 60
- Ìû×Ó: 4021
- ÔÚÏß: 1596.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 890422
- ×¢²á: 2009-11-01
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìå¹âµç×ÓÆ÷¼þ
2Â¥2020-09-03 07:10:29
calos818
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
ÐÂÈ˲ËÄñ
- Ó¦Öú: 11 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 3125.7
- É¢½ð: 77
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 1201
- ÔÚÏß: 730.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 698507
- ×¢²á: 2009-02-08
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔ II £ºµç×ӽṹ
3Â¥2020-09-03 07:44:34













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥