| ²é¿´: 1146 | »Ø¸´: 3 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õßcalos818½«ÔùËÍÄú 100 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
calos818ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
ÐÂÈ˲ËÄñ
|
[ÇóÖú]
Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÇóÖú£¬ÇëÎÊcarrier density distributionsÔõô»£¿ÊǵçºÉÃܶÈÑØ×Åz·½Ïò·Ö²¼£¿
|
|
|
¸÷λ´óÅ££¬ ֮ǰÉó¸åÈÃthe authors may want to add calculations using the marcus theory to intuitively give carrier hopping rates between two layers. ÎÒ½âÊÍÁËĿǰ¶Ìʱ¼äÄÑÒÔ´¦Àí»Ø¸´¹ýÈ¥£¬Éó¸å×îºóÒâ¼ûÊÇ¡°¡±I accept that Marcus theory calculations can be extensive and may be discussed in the future, while I still suggest the authors plot the carrier density distributions. The charge densities at CBM and VBM are useful enough without GW/BSE calculations.¡°¡± ÎÒ×öµÄ¶þάÒìÖʽᣬ¹âË®½â£¬´¹Ö±¶Ñ»ýÁ½¸ö²ÄÁÏ£¬ÓÃHSE06ËãµÄ£¬ ÇëÎÊÕâ¸ö£º¡° carrier density distributions¡±ÊÇʲô£¿ÊǵçºÉÃܶÈÑØ×Åz·½Ïò·Ö²¼»¹ÊÇÆäËûʲô£¿ ÎÒÒѾ»³öÁËVBM CBMµÄband decomposed charge density¡£ лл |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.551.O.5.4,¿ÆÄ¿È«,¿ÉÙ¤¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøT0PÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,¿ÆÄ¿È«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøT0PÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,¿ÆÄ¿È«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøT0PÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8O.55.1.O.5.4,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
2026Äê8ÔÂ25ÈÕ¹ú×ÔÈ»·Å°ñǰͻȻÊÕµ½ÁÐÈëÆÀÉóר¼ÒÓʼþ£¬ÓйØÏµÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
½ñÌìÎñί»á¿ªÍêÁË£¬Ã÷Ìì³ö½á¹ûÂð
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
ÔÚ¼á±ù»¹¸Ç×ű±º£µÄʱºò£¬ÎÒ¿´µ½ÁËŷŵÄ÷»¨¡£
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ã÷ÌìÓ¦¸Ã¿É²éÁË£¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÓÐûÓдóÉñ°ïÎÒ¿´¿´»ù½ð´úÂë
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
·Å°ñǰµÄ²»µ¶¨
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹ØÉ̼ÒÍÆ¼ö: (ÎÒÒ²ÒªÔÚÕâÀïÍÆ¹ã)
zuocuiping
ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 14 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 4975.4
- É¢½ð: 966
- ºì»¨: 60
- Ìû×Ó: 4043
- ÔÚÏß: 1599.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 890422
- ×¢²á: 2009-11-01
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìå¹âµç×ÓÆ÷¼þ
2Â¥2020-09-03 07:10:29
calos818
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
ÐÂÈ˲ËÄñ
- Ó¦Öú: 11 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 3125.7
- É¢½ð: 77
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 1201
- ÔÚÏß: 730.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 698507
- ×¢²á: 2009-02-08
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔ II £ºµç×ӽṹ
3Â¥2020-09-03 07:44:34
calos818
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
ÐÂÈ˲ËÄñ
- Ó¦Öú: 11 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 3125.7
- É¢½ð: 77
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 1201
- ÔÚÏß: 730.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 698507
- ×¢²á: 2009-02-08
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔ II £ºµç×ӽṹ
4Â¥2020-09-03 14:38:36









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
20