24小时热门版块排行榜    

Znn3bq.jpeg
查看: 1162  |  回复: 30
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wangwei2008

木虫 (职业作家)

小木虫之移花宫主

[交流] 论文被拒,555

Dear ***,

We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript EUPH3344R1 "*************************************".

With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, the Editors have decided that your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Euphytica.
Below, please find the comments for your perusal.

YOU ARE KINDLY REQUESTED TO ALSO CHECK THE WEBSITE FOR POSSIBLE REVIEWER ATTACHMENTS!


I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration and wish you every success in finding an alternative place of publication.

With kind regards,

Shri Mohan Jain, PhD
Associate Editor

Comments for the Author:


Reviewer #2: The authors did not address the major concerns (1) genetic characterization of the resistance, (2) the presentation of the paper (for example the lengthy introduction; (3)the English (the title alone is  problematic:"Resistant" should be "resistance"; no sufficient data supporting "high yield and earliness" form the early generations; only one somaclone was identified to be resistant, but "somaclones" is used). The authors stressed the importance of "obtainning stabile somaclones", but this has already demonstrated that both stable and instable somclones exist, for example the paper cited Arun et al (2003) already showed that "The superiority of variants for yield traits and disease resistance was established in R4 generation, confirming the possibility of wheat improvement through somaclonal variation.", therefore, the present study can only be another example in this field, but it alone is not qualified for a paper.




Reviewer #3: The authors revized the manuscript considerably. But, there were still many sentences or words that are incorrect, or inappropriate, or grammatically wrong. It is strongly suggested that the authors of the MS draft would invite a writing-experienced person to revise the MS
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zengzc

LZ不要灰心,继续!
8楼2009-07-15 16:42:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 31 个回答

qdstar2008

铁虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
继续努力,再接再厉!改投,祝你好运!
2楼2009-07-15 16:27:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qzhang6568

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
拒搞次数和水平成正比,没有关系。
5楼2009-07-15 16:35:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

小狗狗

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
楼主投的是修改稿吧?感觉挺遗憾的噢。英文还需要进一步提升
6楼2009-07-15 16:36:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 297,工科调剂? +3 河南农业大学-能 2026-04-14 3/150 2026-04-15 22:02 by noqvsozv
[考研] 284求调剂 +21 让我上岸吧阿西 2026-04-09 21/1050 2026-04-15 21:53 by noqvsozv
[考研] 材料工程281还有调剂机会吗 +43 xaw. 2026-04-11 44/2200 2026-04-15 12:46 by 西北望—风沙
[考研] 366求调剂 +11 不知名的小卅 2026-04-11 11/550 2026-04-14 15:50 by zs92450
[考研] 本科211,报考085601-310分 +16 ararak 2026-04-13 16/800 2026-04-14 14:55 by Delta2012
[考研] 297工科,求调剂? +13 河南农业大学-能 2026-04-12 13/650 2026-04-13 14:12 by dingyanbo1
[考研] 材料考研调剂 +29 云木达达 2026-04-11 31/1550 2026-04-13 13:32 by lyh鲁老师
[考研] 339求调剂 +8 hanwudada 2026-04-11 9/450 2026-04-12 15:36 by laoshidan
[考研] 296求调剂 +14 汪!?! 2026-04-10 16/800 2026-04-12 10:48 by zhouyuwinner
[考研] 电气工程专硕320求调剂 +5 小麻子111 2026-04-10 5/250 2026-04-12 10:47 by zhouyuwinner
[考研] 0854调剂 +12 长弓傲 2026-04-09 13/650 2026-04-12 09:56 by 逆水乘风
[考研] 调剂 +10 只叙离别辞 2026-04-09 12/600 2026-04-11 20:57 by 逆水乘风
[考研] 0859,337求调剂 +4 研s. 2026-04-10 4/200 2026-04-11 11:34 by caotw2020
[考研] 22408 327分求调剂 +4 韵风kon 2026-04-10 4/200 2026-04-11 09:51 by 猪会飞
[考研] 调剂 +12 卷卷卷心菜_ 2026-04-09 13/650 2026-04-10 22:36 by Ftglcn90
[考研] 368求调剂 +3 17385968172 2026-04-10 3/150 2026-04-10 20:12 by 电子奥德彪
[考研] 中科院总分315求调剂 +8 lallalh 2026-04-09 8/400 2026-04-10 19:30 by dick_runner
[考研] 265求调剂 +12 风说她早忘了 2026-04-10 13/650 2026-04-10 18:56 by chemisry
[考研] 344求调剂 +7 丶风雪夜归人丶 2026-04-09 7/350 2026-04-10 12:05 by pengliang8036
[考研] 调剂申请086000一志愿西北农林科技大学生物与医药320分-本科齐鲁工业大学 +3 美美女士 2026-04-09 3/150 2026-04-10 10:31 by liuhuiying09
信息提示
请填处理意见