24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wangwei2008

木虫 (职业作家)

小木虫之移花宫主

应助: 6 (幼儿园)
金币: 4264.6
散金: 1
红花: 1
帖子: 4265
在线: 152.7小时
虫号: 495631
注册: 2008-01-15
专业: 植物生理与生化

[交流] 论文被拒，555

Dear ***,

We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript EUPH3344R1 "*************************************".

With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, the Editors have decided that your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Euphytica.
Below, please find the comments for your perusal.

YOU ARE KINDLY REQUESTED TO ALSO CHECK THE WEBSITE FOR POSSIBLE REVIEWER ATTACHMENTS!

I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration and wish you every success in finding an alternative place of publication.

With kind regards,

Shri Mohan Jain, PhD
Associate Editor

Comments for the Author:

Reviewer #2: The authors did not address the major concerns (1) genetic characterization of the resistance, (2) the presentation of the paper (for example the lengthy introduction; (3)the English (the title alone is problematic:"Resistant" should be "resistance"; no sufficient data supporting "high yield and earliness" form the early generations; only one somaclone was identified to be resistant, but "somaclones" is used). The authors stressed the importance of "obtainning stabile somaclones", but this has already demonstrated that both stable and instable somclones exist, for example the paper cited Arun et al (2003) already showed that "The superiority of variants for yield traits and disease resistance was established in R4 generation, confirming the possibility of wheat improvement through somaclonal variation.", therefore, the present study can only be another example in this field, but it alone is not qualified for a paper.

Reviewer #3: The authors revized the manuscript considerably. But, there were still many sentences or words that are incorrect, or inappropriate, or grammatically wrong. It is strongly suggested that the authors of the MS draft would invite a writing-experienced person to revise the MS

回复此楼