| 查看: 1113 | 回复: 0 | |||
帅酷随意铁虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
关于审稿意见该如何回复
|
|
做了关于ICC生存分析的一篇文章 给了意见1) They need to detail more about the clinical, biochemical, tumor size, number of nodules, advanced or early, with or without vascular invasion, preoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels. In the literature was shown an interesting nomograms: the Wang nomogram was published in 2013 on a derivation cohort of 367 ICC patients resected at a single Asian center and the Hyder nomogram was published in 2014 from a multi-institutional cohort of 514 patients from 13 Western and Eastern centers. These nomograms are useful to validated prognosis and survival and could help the present study to confirm the results in a smaller population.2) Why they divided patients <58 or> 58 years?. BMI of these patients is important as the presence of Diabetes? Regarding others etiologies as hepatitis C, what is the frequency in these ICC cases? Did CEA , alpha feto protein and Ca19-9 levels were correlated with histologic expression? 第一个问题是让附录数据 还是让做成这两种列线图呢（已经做了生存曲线 感觉没有做这个图必要） 第二个问题 该如何回答呢 年龄分组是根据中位数取得，剩下的不知如何回答才好 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有12人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有3人回复
-
科研孤儿太难了
已经有17人回复
-
今日不放榜？网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果
已经有19人回复
-
看来今天不会放榜了？
已经有11人回复
-
时间戳又变了
已经有19人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有14人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有13人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有7人回复
-
感觉是下周放榜了
已经有12人回复
40