| 查看: 1032 | 回复: 0 | |||
帅酷随意铁虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
关于审稿意见该如何回复
|
|
做了关于ICC生存分析的一篇文章 给了意见1) They need to detail more about the clinical, biochemical, tumor size, number of nodules, advanced or early, with or without vascular invasion, preoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels. In the literature was shown an interesting nomograms: the Wang nomogram was published in 2013 on a derivation cohort of 367 ICC patients resected at a single Asian center and the Hyder nomogram was published in 2014 from a multi-institutional cohort of 514 patients from 13 Western and Eastern centers. These nomograms are useful to validated prognosis and survival and could help the present study to confirm the results in a smaller population.2) Why they divided patients <58 or> 58 years?. BMI of these patients is important as the presence of Diabetes? Regarding others etiologies as hepatitis C, what is the frequency in these ICC cases? Did CEA , alpha feto protein and Ca19-9 levels were correlated with histologic expression? 第一个问题是让附录数据 还是让做成这两种列线图呢（已经做了生存曲线 感觉没有做这个图必要） 第二个问题 该如何回答呢 年龄分组是根据中位数取得，剩下的不知如何回答才好 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
无聊看看时间戳打发时间
已经有7人回复
-
27年博士招生信息
已经有7人回复
-
无聊看看filecode
已经有8人回复
-
求推荐期刊，重谢
已经有4人回复
-
有机能跨方向申博吗
已经有3人回复
-
求助！！
已经有4人回复
-
kh550接枝Sio2失败求助
已经有3人回复
-
职称论文投稿
已经有12人回复
-
反应求助
已经有6人回复
-
基于自然哲学类比的风化壳型稀土矿
已经有16人回复