| 查看: 967 | 回复: 0 | |||
帅酷随意铁虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
关于审稿意见该如何回复
|
|
做了关于ICC生存分析的一篇文章 给了意见1) They need to detail more about the clinical, biochemical, tumor size, number of nodules, advanced or early, with or without vascular invasion, preoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels. In the literature was shown an interesting nomograms: the Wang nomogram was published in 2013 on a derivation cohort of 367 ICC patients resected at a single Asian center and the Hyder nomogram was published in 2014 from a multi-institutional cohort of 514 patients from 13 Western and Eastern centers. These nomograms are useful to validated prognosis and survival and could help the present study to confirm the results in a smaller population.2) Why they divided patients <58 or> 58 years?. BMI of these patients is important as the presence of Diabetes? Regarding others etiologies as hepatitis C, what is the frequency in these ICC cases? Did CEA , alpha feto protein and Ca19-9 levels were correlated with histologic expression? 第一个问题是让附录数据 还是让做成这两种列线图呢（已经做了生存曲线 感觉没有做这个图必要） 第二个问题 该如何回答呢 年龄分组是根据中位数取得，剩下的不知如何回答才好 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
交叉科学部支持青年基金，对三无青椒是个机会吗？
已经有3人回复
-
国家级人才课题组招收2026年入学博士
已经有5人回复
-
Fe3O4@SiO2合成
已经有6人回复
-
青年基金C终止
已经有4人回复
-
青椒八年已不青，大家都被折磨成啥样了？
已经有7人回复
-
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有10人回复
-
救命帖
已经有11人回复
-
招博士
已经有5人回复
-
26申博求博导推荐-遥感图像处理方向
已经有4人回复
-
限项规定
已经有7人回复