| 查看: 773 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者我是驴将赠送您 10 个金币 | ||
[求助]
有关傅里叶红外图谱的审稿意见看不大明白，求助
|
||
|
有关傅里叶红外图谱的审稿意见看不大明白，求助各位虫友解读下并指导下解决办法。 1. The way FTIR is described you are not looking at functional groups, so much as the entire averaged makeup of the EPS. Yes, functional groups are part of that, but to analyze them specifically you need to do very specific analyses as a function of pH to tell the difference between bulk and functional groups. I do not believe this was done in this study. 2. What kind of FTIR was used with the KBr approach, transmission? Diffuse reflectance? ATR FTIR? 3. Did you normalize your data? Baseline corrections? What specifically was done to better understand what you were looking at and make sure there was consistency between the samples? |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
今年的WR进展到哪一步了？
已经有8人回复
-
时间戳他又来了
已经有17人回复
-
系统今天又提示维护了，估计离放榜不远了
已经有9人回复
-
产物和副产物价值比较
已经有4人回复
-
这个自发加氧反应的机理是什么？
已经有7人回复
-
J-J-W不为人知的一面
已经有19人回复
-
没消息就是被刷了呗
已经有14人回复
-
微信指数没变化，科研之友没阅读
已经有8人回复
-
这种情况还有戏吗
已经有11人回复
-
同事接到电话了，我却没有
已经有4人回复
