| 查看: 3358 | 回复: 14 | ||
elvissong铁虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
求助SCI审稿意见，麻烦大家分析一下 已有1人参与
|
|
|
投的是medical science monitor,是一篇生信的文章，也是我第一篇sci，目前的状态是“Sent to author(s) for corrections (3 weeks) ”。 返回的三个意见感觉都满尖锐的 一：分析的mRNA的变化不能反应蛋白的变化，毕竟蛋白的变化更重要。为何选择该mRNA进行分析，毕竟一个mRNA的变化不能反应疾病的全貌。。。 这个我大概还是能解释的 二： Title and abstract Spaces either missing or are too many throughout the manuscript. Introduction The introduction should include more background. Material and Methods Details of the search should be included in the method section. There should not be only one keyword. The ethics aspects need to be disclosed and appropriate ethics committee approval must be quoted. Besides mRNA populations, microRNAs (miRNAs) may be equally important in AD. Gloabaly, I would suggest authors to add a interaction of mRNA expression with miRNA. Becauxe single-level research does not fully explain the mechanism of disease development. References This is not believable, and the references are too old and not representative. Does this manuscript reference previous literature appropriately? General comments to the Authors The manuscript is poorly written and is full of strange words and expressions and should be proof-read by an English-speaking person. 三： Introduction The introduction is not in a correct format. In this part the authors should discuss more ( around a page) about previous findings and the link between their study and these previous findings. They should on the other hand shorten the length of their explanation about what they re going to do to two or three general lines of explanation. Discussion Discussion is short. The authors should discuss more on the association of mRNA and AD and the downstream pathways that relate these two to each other. How these changes in mRNA levels can justify the histopathological changes in AD should be discussed more. What are the limitations of this study? Conclusions Just a line of conclusion has been presented. Please explain your conclusions clearly. Future directions and clinical implications of these conclusions should be presented too. General comments to the Authors The manuscript need extensive and thorough language proofreading by an expert. 让我三个星期内改，说实话还是比较打击自信的。因为第一次投稿，也不知道这些审稿意见的尖锐程度正常么，意思就是我的文章英文水平很low（雅思7分），然后很多地方都有问题。。三周之内改。大家觉得这篇文章还有戏么，是不是应该找个什么机构润色一下。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
生物学308分求调剂（一志愿华东师大）
已经有7人回复
-
296材料专硕求调剂
已经有18人回复
-
材料与化工306分找调剂
已经有18人回复
-
302求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
一志愿北京科技大学材料工程085601，求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
283分材料与化工求调剂
已经有19人回复
-
326求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
一志愿郑州大学材料与化工085600，求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
081200-11408-276学硕求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
280求调剂
已经有14人回复
binghamton
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1124.8
- 散金: 20
- 帖子: 401
- 在线: 143.2小时
- 虫号: 21101410
- 注册: 2020-02-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 信息安全
|
1 恭喜楼主第一次投稿就击败75%的投稿人，进入大修 2.poorly written 是部分评审对非母语国家投稿的口头禅 别当真 3 一天回答评审一个问题 提前提交返修文章 别拖 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
2楼2020-04-07 01:25:33
ivy_zheng
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5646.3
- 散金: 10100
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 2655
- 在线: 30小时
- 虫号: 3016030
- 注册: 2014-03-04
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
elvissong6楼2020-04-07 03:06:54
14楼2020-04-08 18:39:00
请叫我松菊师
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4983.4
- 帖子: 1153
- 在线: 57小时
- 虫号: 7236273
- 注册: 2017-09-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 药理学其他科学问题
3楼2020-04-07 01:33:12
mxnjfu
新虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 9890.9
- 散金: 3500
- 红花: 80
- 帖子: 7985
- 在线: 257.1小时
- 虫号: 471628
- 注册: 2007-12-02
- 专业: 环境工程
4楼2020-04-07 01:59:02
kmght
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
AP
- 应助: 615 (博士)
- 金币: 8609.7
- 散金: 1233
- 红花: 82
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 5973
- 在线: 854.9小时
- 虫号: 4245445
- 注册: 2015-11-25
- 专业: 生物海洋学与海洋生物资源
5楼2020-04-07 02:07:46
纳兰天下
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 607.6
- 散金: 4
- 沙发: 6
- 帖子: 657
- 在线: 20.6小时
- 虫号: 21444253
- 注册: 2020-03-12
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 同位素地球化学
7楼2020-04-07 03:24:58
8楼2020-04-07 03:39:29
9楼2020-04-07 06:58:00
elvissong
铁虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4
- 散金: 14
- 帖子: 15
- 在线: 3.8小时
- 虫号: 2630255
- 注册: 2013-09-02
- 专业: 周围神经、神经-肌肉接头、
10楼2020-04-07 11:09:40
