| 查看: 564 | 回复: 1 | ||
[求助]
审稿意见中关于晶体解析的问题 已有1人参与
|
|
各位虫友，我年前投了篇文章，里边有四个晶体，最近收到了审稿人的意见，看来这个审稿人是做晶体解析的，提的问题好专业。本人对晶体解析一窍不通，不知道审稿人说的啥，我把审稿人的意见发出来，请帮忙参谋参谋审稿人想让我干啥。感谢感谢！ 1. -not mentioning the primary and secondary structure solution strategies 2. -there are three structure which were apparently not corrected at all for absorption, which probably led to "interesting" weighting schemes - please use an absorption correction. 3. -I'm not entirely sure whether the long list of OMIT instructions for certain reflections add much to the trustworthiness of the structures. If they are not associated with beam stop or cutoff effects, or cannot otherwise be rationalised, you may be washing out features in the residual map rather than improving the refinements. I haven't done a re-refinement on the structures, but this is something that should be commented on. 4. -In general, head the warnings from CIFCheck, and comment on them in the paper how they were checked and why they cannot be resolved. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
中南大学易小艺课题组诚招2026申请-考核制博士生
已经有0人回复
-
海南师范大学招收化学博士（光电功能材料课题组招收博士研究生）
已经有10人回复
-
无机化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有215人回复
匿名
用户注销 (知名作家)
精修问题可私信
- CMEI: 2
- 应助: 2712 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.836
- 金币: 38467.5
- 散金: 1801
- 红花: 400
- 帖子: 5825
- 在线: 1932.4小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2008-10-05
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 药物分析
- 管辖: 晶体
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
38900354: 金币+50, ★★★★★最佳答案, 非常感谢！作为只会合成不会解析晶体的人，这样的问题太伤脑筋。只能找解析的老师看看咋处理了。 2020-02-26 17:48:38
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
38900354: 金币+50, ★★★★★最佳答案, 非常感谢！作为只会合成不会解析晶体的人，这样的问题太伤脑筋。只能找解析的老师看看咋处理了。 2020-02-26 17:48:38
 本帖仅楼主可见 |
2楼2020-02-26 10:04:34