| 查看: 3514 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 boytde 的 5 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
论文投稿意见
|
|||
|
收到编辑意见，希望大家能帮忙出出主意，这篇文章已经拒过两次了。审稿人有一个意见因为时间和条件限制无法实现，再投希望大吗？ Decision Reject and encourage resubmission Comments The manuscript has been improved from the initial submission but the authors failed to to reflect the implications and limitations derived from their experimental setup and the discussion along the review process. I encourage the authors to take into account the comments form the reviewers in the interpretation of their results and their conclusions. Similarly, the reflections and limitations acknowledged in their last response to reviewers should be summarized in their paper to avoid any misinterpretation of their methods and findings.  发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料学硕318求调剂
已经有21人回复
-
271求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
328求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
080500材料科学与工程
已经有11人回复
-
成果系统访问量大，请15分钟后再尝试。由此给您造成的不便，敬请谅解。
已经有17人回复
-
282求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
化工282求调剂一志愿211
已经有4人回复
-
306求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
332材料求调剂
已经有5人回复
|
感谢您的意见，我也觉得有些审稿人的意见并不现实，而且编辑一直坚持让我按照他的意见修，没有提出别的资料。我也了解到MDPI很多人吐槽，这篇文章水平不太够，快毕业了想赶紧丢出去。 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
7楼2020-02-21 10:34:51
2楼2020-02-20 23:43:07
3楼2020-02-20 23:43:10
4楼2020-02-21 00:06:14
10