| 查看: 1797 | 回复: 8 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
lironui金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
remote sensing审稿人意见，请问虫友们该怎么回啊 已有4人参与
|
||
|
Dear authors. In my opinion, the paper is not well written.??More importantly, to introduce a new methodology (Classification of Hyperspectral Image Based on Double-Branch Dual-Attention Mechanism Network ) a suitable experimental design should be used.? This would require to have some very clear objectives. In my??opinion, objectives are not clear, and the results and validation sections are not convincing ... and generally poorly illustrated. Therefore, for the??time being, I cannot recommend to publish your manuscript. It need a major revision. ?Re-write the abstract, introduction and method sections.? The method section is weak. You need to clarify the four steps (add a methodology flowchart, etc.) all Figures are too small and hard to see clearly! Make larger please.?(Legend is not clear). Figures and tables caption should be complete to let readers understand it well without referring to the text. Overall, English grammar and formations are still poor, and need to be improved. I personally think that your conclusion are weak. 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
Fe3O4@SiO2合成
已经有7人回复
-
多组分精馏求助
已经有6人回复
-
免疫学博士有名额，速联系
已经有8人回复
-
26申博求博导推荐-遥感图像处理方向
已经有5人回复
-
国家级人才课题组招收2026年入学博士
已经有6人回复
-
交叉科学部支持青年基金，对三无青椒是个机会吗？
已经有7人回复
-
青椒八年已不青，大家都被折磨成啥样了？
已经有15人回复
-
国家基金申请书模板内插入图片不可调整大小?
已经有6人回复
7楼2020-02-11 15:18:50
lironui
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1118.2
- 散金: 234
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 430
- 在线: 55.7小时
- 虫号: 15550750
- 注册: 2019-07-08
- 专业: 模式识别
2楼2020-01-18 10:10:15
★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2020-01-18 20:10:15
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2020-01-18 20:10:15
|
1.方法的实验对比结果，验证结果较差2.图表的细节上需要处理3.摘要，引言，结论等需求部分语法错误较大，且没有阐明出重点。 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
3楼2020-01-18 10:25:43
4楼2020-01-18 10:27:01