| 查看: 527 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者dicknenu将赠送您 5 个金币 | |||
[求助]
投了篇meta分析，给了大修，这条审稿人的意见有点没看懂
|
|||
|
"List and define all variables for which data were sought (e.g., PICOS, funding sources) and any assumptions and simplifications made." It is not clear whether additional variables were sought and obtained. This bears on the question of whether the authors data-dredged to get their result. Nor is it clear whether any data conventions were set for the data obtained. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有5人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有22人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有5人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有4人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复