| 查看: 580 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者dicknenu将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||
[求助]
投了篇meta分析，给了大修，这条审稿人的意见有点没看懂
|
||
|
"List and define all variables for which data were sought (e.g., PICOS, funding sources) and any assumptions and simplifications made." It is not clear whether additional variables were sought and obtained. This bears on the question of whether the authors data-dredged to get their result. Nor is it clear whether any data conventions were set for the data obtained. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
10