| ²é¿´: 504 | »Ø¸´: 4 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| ¡¾Óн±½»Á÷¡¿»ý¼«»Ø¸´±¾Ìû×Ó£¬²ÎÓë½»Á÷£¬¾ÍÓлú»á·ÖµÃ×÷Õß li84song µÄ 16 ¸ö½ð±Ò | |||
li84song½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÇóÓÃPlaton¸Ä±ä×î´óµçºÉÃܶȺÍÏÔʾ·Ö×Ó¼ä¼ü
|
||
|
ÒÔǰûÓùýplaton£¬ÏÖÔÚ·¢ÎÄÕ£¬ÐÞ¸ÄʱÖ÷Éó˵maximum electron density value´óÁË£¬ÒªÎÒÓÃplationÐÞÏ£¬Çë¸÷λ¸ßÊÖ°ïæ£¬ÔõôÐÞ£¬×îºÃÏêϸµã¡£»¹ÓоÍÊÇÓÃshelxtl½âµ¥¾§Ê±ÊäÈëHtabµ«ÊÇ·Ö×Ó¼ü×÷ÓÃÁ¦Ã»ÓÐÏÔʾ£¬Ôõô°ì£¬ÓÃplationÔõôÐÞ¡£ÏÂÃæÊÇÖ÷É󏸵ģº I see a problem in maximum electron density value in compound 2 of 3.034 eÅ-3. As this structure contains solvent accessible voids of 84 Å3 the problem could be disordered solvent molecule (possibly water molecule). If this is a problem I recommend authors to use Platon Squeeze procedure in modelling this disorder solvent molecule. After refinement with new "squeezed" HKL data maximum electron density should be much lower, and new CIF should be than deposited with the CCDC (structure will retain same CCDC number - 706730). Platon Squeeze procedure used in disordered solvent modelling should be mentioned in Experimental, and all data in text and tables should be checked and if it is necessary changed. If authors think that problem is not disordered solvent they must give detailed explanation for such high maximum electron density in Experimental, specify the name of the nearest atom to this maximum and its distance from the maximum. [ Last edited by li84song on 2009-6-18 at 09:34 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÖÐÄÏ´óѧÒ×СÒÕ¿ÎÌâ×é³ÏÕÐ2026ÉêÇë-¿¼ºËÖÆ²©Ê¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
º£ÄÏʦ·¶´óѧÕÐÊÕ»¯Ñ§²©Ê¿£¨¹âµç¹¦ÄܲÄÁÏ¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú£©
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ÎÞ»ú»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ103È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú¼¸¸öÍŴصÄcif
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
¼±Çó¸Ã·´Ó¦µÄÏêϸ»úÀí
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¡¾Ei | Scopus Ë«¼ìË÷¡¿2026ÄêÖÇÄܽ»Í¨ÓëδÀ´³öÐйú¼Ê»áÒ飨CSTFM 2026£©
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
¡¾EI|Scopus Ë«¼ìË÷¡¿2026ÄêµÚÁù½ì»úÆ÷ÈËÓëÈ˹¤ÖÇÄܹú¼Ê»áÒ飨JCRAI 2026£©
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
zoteroµÄadvanced materialÄ£°åûÓиüУ¬ÓÐÈËÓÐаæµÄclsÎļþÂð
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
¡¾¸ßУÁªºÏ¾Ù°ì¡¿2026ÄêµÚÎå½ì·þÎñ»úÆ÷È˹ú¼Ê»áÒ飨ICoSR 2026£©
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹ØÉ̼ÒÍÆ¼ö: (ÎÒÒ²ÒªÔÚÕâÀïÍÆ¹ã)
wmt1447
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.555
- ½ð±Ò: 13456.7
- É¢½ð: 367
- ºì»¨: 6
- ɳ·¢: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 3579
- ÔÚÏß: 157.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 278545
- ×¢²á: 2006-09-10
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ó¦Óø߷Ö×Ó»¯Ñ§ÓëÎïÀí
- ¹ÜϽ: ¼ìË÷֪ʶ

2Â¥2009-06-17 23:11:21
liutaone
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 240.6
- É¢½ð: 50
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 959
- ÔÚÏß: 78Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 730864
- ×¢²á: 2009-03-25
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
¡ï ¡ï
li84song(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0): 6-18 09:31
li84song(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0): 6-18 09:31
| ÊDz»ÊÇ»¹ÓÐû¶¨µÄÈܼÁ·Ö×Óѽ£¬»òÕßÈܼÁÎÞÐò¡£HTABÐÞÍê»áÔÚlstÎļþÖÐÓÐÏÔʾµÄ |
3Â¥2009-06-17 23:45:55
xuanyuanjie
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
ľ³æÒþÐÞÊ¿
- Ó¦Öú: 10 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 19287.8
- É¢½ð: 196
- ºì»¨: 25
- Ìû×Ó: 3004
- ÔÚÏß: 229.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 453112
- ×¢²á: 2007-11-06
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Åäλ»¯Ñ§

4Â¥2009-06-20 01:51:09
xiaochong98
ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- CMEI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 208 (´óѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 19217.6
- É¢½ð: 20
- ºì»¨: 16
- Ìû×Ó: 4720
- ÔÚÏß: 667.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 71782
- ×¢²á: 2005-06-01
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÉúÎﻯѧ
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
paopaomeng(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл½»Á÷ 6-20 08:28
li84song(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0): 6-21 00:15
paopaomeng(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл½»Á÷ 6-20 08:28
li84song(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0): 6-21 00:15
| platon ÖÐÑ¡Ôñcalc all£¬×Ðϸ¿´¼üÖ®¼ä×÷ÓÃÁ¦ |

5Â¥2009-06-20 07:12:46













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥