24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ining

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 2305.7
红花: 3
帖子: 488
在线: 96小时
虫号: 7779131
注册: 2018-01-16

[交流] 单一和多重过敏呼吸道变应性疾病儿童屋尘螨舌下特异性免疫治疗的疗效和安全性已有5人参与

Background: The efficacy of single-allergen-specific immunotherapy in polysensitized subjects is a matter of debate. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of house dust mite (HDM) sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in monosensitized and polysensitized children.

Methods: A total of 112 children, aged 4 to 13 years old, with HDM-induced respiratory allergic diseases were allocated to a monosensitized group (n = 56) or a polysensitized group (n = 56). Both groups were treated by standard pharmacotherapy and SLIT with Dermatophagoides farinae (American HDM) extracts for 52 weeks. Symptoms, medications, visual analogue scale (VAS), and presence of adverse events (AEs) were assessed once a month. Skinprick test (SPT) was done before and aer treatment. After treatment, subjects in the polysensitized group who completed the study were further analyzed as subgroup 1 (n=20) and subgroup 2 (n=15) according to the number of coexisting allergens.

Results: Forty-one subjects in the monosensitized group and 35 subjects in the polysensitized group completed the study. The global clinical parameters had significantly improved after treatment, with no significant difference between the monosensitized and polysensitized group throughout this period (all p > 0.05). The comparison among the monosensitized group, subgroup 1, and subgroup 2 indicated that there was no significant difference in symptoms scores and VAS at each scheduled follow-up visit. Therewas also no significant difference in total medications score (TMS) in the monosensitized group, subgroup 1, and subgroup 2 after week 24 (all p > 0.05). No severe systemic AEs were reported.

Conclusion: No significant difference was observed in the clinical effects of HDM SLIT between polysensitized and monosensitized children with respiratory allergic diseases.

回复此楼