| 查看: 6187 | 回复: 11 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Sucked at Interview
|
|||
|
This week I received an invitation for an online interview from an Austrian university and I was so looking forward to speaking to the prof. The interview was held at midnight yesterday, I was surprised to see four people sitting in front of the camera. It wasn't my first time to be interviewed by a group of people but it was indeed the worst one. Most of the questions raised were about my master thesis which is my biggest drawback. I felt like they were so unsatisfied with my background and so became more and more nervous when seeing their reactions to my answers. They asked, for example, what's wrong with your thesis, what kinds of methodologies you adopted, why you didn't use more advanced statistical methods, didn't you have a supervisor who can help you check the direction of your thesis, were data and experiment collected and conducted by you, how you explain that your profile isn't that good? I understand sometimes interviewers prefer to examine candidates by pushing and criticising them, however, questions they kept asking sound they found no interest in my other experience and my research proposal. At last, of course, they didn't ask me about my mobility since obviously, they won't consider me. Writing this post isn't meant to blame on them, I am just curious about the motivation of them to carry out this interview concerning they look caring so much about the quality of my thesis but also have already learnt that it was a bad job from my transcript. I wonder if they think this is acceptable, why they just looked at my past work instead of discussing more current issues like the proposal and other relevant aspects such as the data project I joined last year to get a more comprehensive understanding about me. Conversely, if they think this is too bad to accept, why they should waste their time talking to me for over thirty minutes? I am so confused. Does anyone have the same experience with me? |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分？
已经有12人回复
-
2019年青年基金涵评意见，大家看看几个A，几个B?
已经有4人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有29人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有9人回复
-
是这周出结果还是下周出结果？
已经有3人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有9人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有4人回复
-
帮忙看看fileCode
已经有13人回复
-
为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果
已经有7人回复
-
读博的好处
已经有3人回复
4楼2019-11-06 14:32:08
2楼2019-11-02 10:26:14
a1nba
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 297 (大学生)
- 金币: 4091.3
- 散金: 270
- 红花: 93
- 帖子: 2148
- 在线: 359.4小时
- 虫号: 1488921
- 注册: 2011-11-13
- 专业: 电化学
3楼2019-11-03 12:27:10
|
What they were looking for is an assistant, unlike the regular European PhD positions affiliated to a fixed project, so they didn't tell much about the info of their research projects. They asked for a research proposal but didn't pay much attention to discuss it while the direction of my master thesis is actually not within their research fields. |
5楼2019-11-06 21:48:20
100