| ²é¿´: 1786 | »Ø¸´: 11 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õß@íµíµ@½«ÔùËÍÄú 10 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
@íµíµ@гæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Ï£ÍûÓÐÈ˰ïÎÒѧϰӢÓï ÒÑÓÐ2È˲ÎÓë
|
|
|
ÈçÌ⣬¸Ðл ·¢×ÔСľ³æIOS¿Í»§¶Ë |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
271²ÄÁϹ¤³ÌÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
281Çóµ÷¼Á£¨0805£©
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ìì´ó²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤£¨085600£©×Ü·Ö338
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
085700×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Çó²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
294Çóµ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖпƼ¼´óѧ£¬080502£¬354·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¼ªÁÖ´óѧ²ÄÁÏѧ˶321Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
źڵÄèͷӥ
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 53 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 6003.2
- É¢½ð: 2450
- ºì»¨: 46
- Ìû×Ó: 23904
- ÔÚÏß: 3067.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1425450
- ×¢²á: 2011-10-02
- רҵ: ¼ÆËã»úÓ¦Óü¼Êõ

2Â¥2019-10-20 21:27:31
ENFP2013
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1785
- É¢½ð: 996
- ºì»¨: 5
- ɳ·¢: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 940
- ÔÚÏß: 85Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 5057445
- ×¢²á: 2016-09-25
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¿ØÖÆÀíÂÛÓë·½·¨
3Â¥2019-10-20 22:26:12
@íµíµ@
гæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 356.5
- É¢½ð: 291
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 484
- ÔÚÏß: 44.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 14573925
- ×¢²á: 2019-03-12
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ·¨ÂÉʷѧ
4Â¥2019-10-20 23:27:50
źڵÄèͷӥ
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 53 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 6003.2
- É¢½ð: 2450
- ºì»¨: 46
- Ìû×Ó: 23904
- ÔÚÏß: 3067.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1425450
- ×¢²á: 2011-10-02
- רҵ: ¼ÆËã»úÓ¦Óü¼Êõ

5Â¥2019-10-21 14:16:42
źڵÄèͷӥ
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 53 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 6003.2
- É¢½ð: 2450
- ºì»¨: 46
- Ìû×Ó: 23904
- ÔÚÏß: 3067.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1425450
- ×¢²á: 2011-10-02
- רҵ: ¼ÆËã»úÓ¦Óü¼Êõ

6Â¥2019-10-21 14:19:54
mac194
Ìú³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 128 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 21401.3
- ºì»¨: 101
- Ìû×Ó: 3332
- ÔÚÏß: 3370.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2488597
- ×¢²á: 2013-05-30
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ó²ÄÁϵļӹ¤Óë³ÉÐÍ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
|
ÈÕ³£Ó¢Óï »¹ÊÇ ·¨ÂÉʷѧ רҵӢÓï ?? RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the court. Amicus views this case as kin to Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. The sex criterion stigmatizes when it is used to limit hours of work for women only. It assumes that all women are preoccupied with home and children. These distinctions have a common effect. They help keep woman in her place, a place inferior to that occupied by men. The law must stop using sex as a shorthand for functional description. The judgment enjoins enforcement of the statute insofar as it discriminates on the basis of sex. |
7Â¥2019-10-21 14:53:22
qqbigshot
½ð³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 24614.5
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 3245
- ÔÚÏß: 110.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3815269
- ×¢²á: 2015-04-17
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ö²Îï·ÖÀàѧ
8Â¥2019-10-21 16:44:26
@íµíµ@
гæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 356.5
- É¢½ð: 291
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 484
- ÔÚÏß: 44.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 14573925
- ×¢²á: 2019-03-12
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ·¨ÂÉʷѧ
9Â¥2019-10-22 15:33:04
@íµíµ@
гæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 356.5
- É¢½ð: 291
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 484
- ÔÚÏß: 44.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 14573925
- ×¢²á: 2019-03-12
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ·¨ÂÉʷѧ
10Â¥2019-10-22 15:33:21













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
