24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1054  |  回复: 3
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者医学僧僧将赠送您 8 个金币

医学僧僧

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 投稿求助 已有1人参与

七月底投的BMC infectious diseases,一周后回信说有重复,建议修改后重投,8月14重投,8.27送审,今天收到被拒的稿件,第一个编辑拒的很干脆,提出的问题也很专业,第二个编辑认为还可以,需要修一修,主编直接给的拒绝,各位大神看看,改一改重投还有机会不?附部分原文
Dear Professor Zhao,

Thank you for considering BMC Infectious Diseases for your manuscript.Peer review of your manuscript is now complete and, based on the reports, I am sorry to say that we cannot consider the manuscript for publication and are closing your file.

The reviewers' reports are included at the end of this email. Please note that as BMC Infectious Diseases has a policy of open peer review, you will be able to see the names of the reviewers.
I wish you every success with your research and hope that you will consider us again in the future.

Best wishes,

Mar Masiá, MD, PhD
BMC Infectious Diseases
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/
Editor Comments:
Reviewer reports:
Jesús Bermejo-Martín (Reviewer 1): This paper present a combined score formed by A,B and C to improve mortality prediction . This work present major flaws and defects in the design.

- Relative novelty: The paper shows a very similar approach to that already published in PMID: 28958655, By the way, this paper is not cited iby the authors.?
- A is a biomarker denoting severity in those infections of bacterial origin. The authors do not present any data on the bacterial or viral
By the way, this paper is not cited iby the authors.?
In definitive, The authors should address this drawback in the future.?

Minor comments:
Further details on how the authors constructed the combined scores should be provided in the methodology.

Ito Akihiro (Reviewer 2): Reviewer comments
I think that this study is interesting and significant, however, I think that there are some important points to be revised.

发自小木虫IOS客户端
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

songcumt

至尊木虫 (职业作家)


【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
医学僧僧(liouzhan654代发): 金币+42, 感谢交流 2019-09-30 10:05:26
通常来说拒稿了是不建议重投的,除非你做出了重大修改,并在cover letter里详细说明。审稿意见说你的实验设计存在重大缺陷,需要针对这个好好修改
2楼2019-09-30 09:06:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

医学僧僧

新虫 (小有名气)

3楼2019-09-30 09:07:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
4楼2019-09-30 10:12:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 医学僧僧 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 材料与化工(0856)304求B区调剂 +7 邱gl 2026-03-10 10/500 2026-03-14 00:45 by JourneyLucky
[考研] b区环境工程求调剂 +4 Maps1 2026-03-10 6/300 2026-03-14 00:23 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 318求调剂 +3 李新光 2026-03-10 3/150 2026-03-14 00:21 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 304求调剂 +6 Mochaaaa 2026-03-12 7/350 2026-03-13 22:18 by 星空星月
[考研] [0860]321分求调剂,ab区皆可 +4 宝贵热 2026-03-13 4/200 2026-03-13 22:01 by 星空星月
[考研] 304求调剂 +7 7712b 2026-03-13 7/350 2026-03-13 21:42 by peike
[考研] 289求调剂 +3 李政莹 2026-03-12 3/150 2026-03-13 11:02 by 求调剂zz
[考研] 333求调剂 +3 152697 2026-03-12 4/200 2026-03-13 07:08 by Iveryant
[基金申请] 国自科面上基金字体 +3 iwuli 2026-03-12 3/150 2026-03-12 22:43 by lfy8008
[考研] 0832食品科学与工程293调剂 +4 东东不東 2026-03-07 4/200 2026-03-12 14:21 by ZhengYI21
[考研] 290求调剂 +3 柯淮然 2026-03-10 8/400 2026-03-11 13:48 by 柯淮然
[考研] 材料工程307,求调剂 +7 我要燃烧你的梦 2026-03-08 7/350 2026-03-11 09:09 by 剑诗杜康
[基金申请] 提交后的基金本子,已让学校撤回了,可否换口子提交 +3 dut_pfx 2026-03-10 3/150 2026-03-11 08:38 by kudofaye
[考研] 265求调剂 +8 小木虫085600 2026-03-09 11/550 2026-03-10 19:44 by 绿色低碳化学
[考研] 0856材料与化工353分求调剂 +11 NIFFFfff 2026-03-09 11/550 2026-03-10 18:36 by suyuanhai
[考研] 327分求调剂086 +4 西红柿?小帅 2026-03-09 7/350 2026-03-10 14:47 by ruiyingmiao
[考研] 294 英二数二物化 求调剂 +6 米饭团不好吃 2026-03-09 6/300 2026-03-09 23:55 by barlinike
[考研] 295复试调剂 +4 简木ChuFront 2026-03-09 4/200 2026-03-09 21:49 by wangjihu
[考研] 求调剂,一志愿江南大学,食品科学与工程,总分,320 +3 yyyyyukino 2026-03-07 3/150 2026-03-08 23:07 by 清风月
[考研] 调剂 +3 13853210211 2026-03-08 3/150 2026-03-08 19:34 by ms629
信息提示
请填处理意见