24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 975  |  回复: 3
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者医学僧僧将赠送您 8 个金币

医学僧僧

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 投稿求助 已有1人参与

七月底投的BMC infectious diseases,一周后回信说有重复,建议修改后重投,8月14重投,8.27送审,今天收到被拒的稿件,第一个编辑拒的很干脆,提出的问题也很专业,第二个编辑认为还可以,需要修一修,主编直接给的拒绝,各位大神看看,改一改重投还有机会不?附部分原文
Dear Professor Zhao,

Thank you for considering BMC Infectious Diseases for your manuscript.Peer review of your manuscript is now complete and, based on the reports, I am sorry to say that we cannot consider the manuscript for publication and are closing your file.

The reviewers' reports are included at the end of this email. Please note that as BMC Infectious Diseases has a policy of open peer review, you will be able to see the names of the reviewers.
I wish you every success with your research and hope that you will consider us again in the future.

Best wishes,

Mar Masiá, MD, PhD
BMC Infectious Diseases
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/
Editor Comments:
Reviewer reports:
Jesús Bermejo-Martín (Reviewer 1): This paper present a combined score formed by A,B and C to improve mortality prediction . This work present major flaws and defects in the design.

- Relative novelty: The paper shows a very similar approach to that already published in PMID: 28958655, By the way, this paper is not cited iby the authors.?
- A is a biomarker denoting severity in those infections of bacterial origin. The authors do not present any data on the bacterial or viral
By the way, this paper is not cited iby the authors.?
In definitive, The authors should address this drawback in the future.?

Minor comments:
Further details on how the authors constructed the combined scores should be provided in the methodology.

Ito Akihiro (Reviewer 2): Reviewer comments
I think that this study is interesting and significant, however, I think that there are some important points to be revised.

发自小木虫IOS客户端
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

songcumt

至尊木虫 (职业作家)


【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
医学僧僧(liouzhan654代发): 金币+42, 感谢交流 2019-09-30 10:05:26
通常来说拒稿了是不建议重投的,除非你做出了重大修改,并在cover letter里详细说明。审稿意见说你的实验设计存在重大缺陷,需要针对这个好好修改
2楼2019-09-30 09:06:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

医学僧僧

新虫 (小有名气)

3楼2019-09-30 09:07:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
4楼2019-09-30 10:12:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 医学僧僧 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见