| 查看: 2158 | 回复: 4 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者医学僧僧将赠送您 100 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
投稿BMC，两个月后被拒，重投还有机会吗？ 已有1人参与
|
||
|
七月底投的BMC infectious diseases,一周后回信说有重复，建议修改后重投，8月14重投，8.27送审，今天收到被拒的稿件，第一个编辑拒的很干脆，提出的问题也很专业，第二个编辑认为还可以，需要修一修，主编直接给的拒绝，各位大神看看，改一改重投还有机会不？附部分原文 Dear Professor Zhao, Thank you for considering BMC Infectious Diseases for your manuscript.Peer review of your manuscript is now complete and, based on the reports, I am sorry to say that we cannot consider the manuscript for publication and are closing your file. The reviewers' reports are included at the end of this email. Please note that as BMC Infectious Diseases has a policy of open peer review, you will be able to see the names of the reviewers. I wish you every success with your research and hope that you will consider us again in the future. Best wishes, Mar Masiá, MD, PhD BMC Infectious Diseases https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/ Editor Comments: Reviewer reports: Jesús Bermejo-Martín (Reviewer 1): This paper present a combined score formed by A,B and C to improve mortality prediction . This work present major flaws and defects in the design. - Relative novelty: The paper shows a very similar approach to that already published in PMID: 28958655, By the way, this paper is not cited iby the authors.? - A is a biomarker denoting severity in those infections of bacterial origin. The authors do not present any data on the bacterial or viral By the way, this paper is not cited iby the authors.? In definitive, The authors should address this drawback in the future.? Minor comments: Further details on how the authors constructed the combined scores should be provided in the methodology. Ito Akihiro (Reviewer 2): Reviewer comments I think that this study is interesting and significant, however, I think that there are some important points to be revised. 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
为什么国自然不能直接公布
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有7人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有4人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有8人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有15人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有11人回复
bobvan
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4827 (副教授)
- 金币: 32517.6
- 散金: 21800
- 红花: 352
- 帖子: 11253
- 在线: 1527.1小时
- 虫号: 2171443
- 注册: 2012-12-07
- 专业: 催化化学
4楼2019-09-30 13:00:51
fqcgfqcgfqcg
木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 93 (初中生)
- 金币: 1689.4
- 散金: 30984
- 红花: 80
- 帖子: 23129
- 在线: 562.1小时
- 虫号: 1181703
- 注册: 2011-01-01
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 法医学
2楼2019-09-30 09:41:22
3楼2019-09-30 10:15:31
5楼2019-10-02 14:55:31
5
投票:
