24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3141  |  回复: 9

hitwhwyr

铁虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 审稿回复求助,如何回复主编的意见(主编给的意见很笼统)已有2人参与

International journal of energy research杂志
给的大修,其中主编的意见如下:
Reviewer: 3 (EiC)
Comments to the Author
- Explain how the paper differs from others published in IJER.
- State specific objectives.
- Get its English edited very carefully.
- Provide better quality figures.
- State main findings in the conclusions.
- Reduce the content similarity index to less than 15% with no more than 1% from a source.
- Finally, it is reminded that increasing the number of co-authors is NOT allowed.
这种看起来像是通用的意见应该怎么回复呢?也要一条条仔细回答吗?再比如 State main findings in the conclusions.这种怎么答复修改呢?我在结论里已经阐述了主要结论了呀?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

songcumt

至尊木虫 (职业作家)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖

hitwhwyr

铁虫 (初入文坛)

songcumt

至尊木虫 (职业作家)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖

hitwhwyr

铁虫 (初入文坛)

songcumt

至尊木虫 (职业作家)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖

hitwhwyr

铁虫 (初入文坛)

hitwhwyr

铁虫 (初入文坛)

hitwhwyr

铁虫 (初入文坛)

web6688

铁虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 hitwhwyr 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见