24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3620  |  回复: 8
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者melissa135将赠送您 5 个金币

melissa135

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] Bioinformatics投稿直接被编辑拒回来,可以再argue一下吗 已有4人参与

本人之前投Bioinformatics的一篇拙作被拒回来,看起来是编辑直接直接拒稿的。如果是被reviewers给文章批的一无是处倒也罢了,被编辑打回来一点理由也没有让我也很迷茫 。这种情况是因为文章质量着实太差了吗,有没有可能去和编辑argue一下还能得到审稿机会?

下附editor的邮件。

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your manuscript for publication in Bioinformatics. I regret that the editors are unable to consider the manuscript for further review. There have been a number of approaches for xxxxxx and only a limited number are evaluated in this work. Given that quite a few approaches have been developed, a more thorough comparison to state-of-the-art is needed.

I am sorry to disappoint you, but the journal is currently receiving many more submissions than can be published - over 2000 submissions were received in 2018. Hence only those of the very highest quality and significance are accepted (the editors currently aim for an acceptance rate of ~20-25%).

Even though a substantial amount of careful work has been done, I must formally decline the manuscript and am returning it to you without further review so that you can resubmit it elsewhere without delay. Please note that we will not consider any further versions of this manuscript.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

五月的天儿

新虫 (小有名气)

投别的吧,editor的回复已经说得很清楚了

发自小木虫Android客户端
2楼2019-07-04 21:05:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Superdongwin

新虫 (正式写手)

说明文章质量达不到该期刊要求,换期刊吧兄弟,别闹笑话。如果有reviewer意见,且比较正面,然后编辑拒,你可以尝试去argue

发自小木虫IOS客户端
3楼2019-07-04 21:10:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
4楼2019-07-04 22:41:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bobvan

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
There have been a number of approaches for xxxxxx and only a limited number are evaluated in this work. Given that quite a few approaches have been developed, a more thorough comparison to state-of-the-art is needed.
已经给你理由了
5楼2019-07-05 00:28:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

TE225

捐助贵宾 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
一般这种情况不是由于你工作”质量“不行,而是缺乏创新性,所以编辑就一键否决了。而且这编辑挺绝的:”Please note that we will not consider any further versions of this manuscript.“还是第一次看到这种话,断了念想吧,兄弟!
6楼2019-07-05 01:23:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

star7758521

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
建议不要投了
没有意义
专投
7楼2019-07-06 09:11:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

伊一易

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

编辑直接拒的,你argue发过去还是给编辑,你觉得你的观点多强能让编辑改变自己的想法。基本不可能,改投吧
8楼2019-07-11 12:47:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liang8541

新虫 (正式写手)

bio编辑觉得不行,不送审的。没啥好argue的

发自小木虫Android客户端
9楼2019-07-17 16:40:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 melissa135 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见