24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2534  |  回复: 8
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者yuanye2010将赠送您 20 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

yuanye2010

金虫 (小有名气)

[求助] SCI二审大修意见如下,三审半个月变Ready for decision,当天又变成 Decision Pending 已有1人参与

三审半个月变成Ready for decision,当天又变成 Decision Pending!!求师兄师姐分析下结果!谢谢 要靠他毕业!
二审追加了两次审稿人后四个审稿人意见如下:
Associate Editor
There are different opinions about this paper. The contributions of the paper remain unclear. The comparison with [29] should be justified. Simulation results need better organization and elaborations. A chance is provided to the authors to justify the work and additional reviewers may be assigned.
Reviewer 1
The contributions of the paper are not clearly presented. The significance of the proposed work as compared to [29] should be justified.
Reviewer 2
This paper proposes a distributed algorithm for the economic dispatch problem (EDP). It mainly studies the stochastic gradient-push method with asynchronous step-size and noisy gradient to deal with the finite delays in time-varying directed communication network of EDP. The author shows nice mathematical skills in presenting the results. However, the reviewer has to raise some questions about the model and algorithm in this study:
1.    Why not to include ramp-up and ramp-down limit constraint for units in the EDP model? Is the proposed algorithm applicable for an EDP model with time coupling constraints?
2.    The author should indicate the difference or improvement of the proposed algorithm in this study compared with reference [29].
3.    In introduction, the author mentioned ‘This work adopts asynchronous step-size, which provides a more flexible range for step-size.’ However, the advantage of asynchronous step-size is well displayed in Section 5.
4.    Numerical results in Section 5 should be simplified or reorganized. The author can just take one test system to analyze the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in detail (for instance, 4-bus system). Moreover, comparison results between different cases are recommended to present in a table format for a better display.
Reviewer 3
I have no further comments.
Reviewer 4
The revised paper can be accepted by minor revisions.
1. Please give the name, unit of the vertical coordinates for figures.
2. The literature review is not sufficient. Please refer to:3篇参考文献

爱斯维尔这个这次接收的纪律大吗???已经 Decision Pending !谢谢
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qiluo2007

木虫 (著名写手)

3楼2019-05-21 09:02:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 9 个回答

maplecas

木虫 (著名写手)

学术交流
2楼2019-05-21 08:45:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yuanye2010

金虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by qiluo2007 at 2019-05-21 09:02:51
不就应该这个样子吗

这样子是中的概率大还是?两天了,还是 Decision Pending
4楼2019-05-21 17:22:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yuanye2010

金虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by maplecas at 2019-05-21 08:45:34
祝好运,应该没问题了

这样子是中的概率大还是?两天了,还是 Decision Pending
5楼2019-05-21 17:23:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见