| 查看: 2532 | 回复: 8 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者yuanye2010将赠送您 20 个金币 | ||
yuanye2010金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
SCI二审大修意见如下，三审半个月变Ready for decision，当天又变成 Decision Pending 已有1人参与
|
|
|
三审半个月变成Ready for decision，当天又变成 Decision Pending！！求师兄师姐分析下结果！谢谢 要靠他毕业！ 二审追加了两次审稿人后四个审稿人意见如下： Associate Editor There are different opinions about this paper. The contributions of the paper remain unclear. The comparison with [29] should be justified. Simulation results need better organization and elaborations. A chance is provided to the authors to justify the work and additional reviewers may be assigned. Reviewer 1 The contributions of the paper are not clearly presented. The significance of the proposed work as compared to [29] should be justified. Reviewer 2 This paper proposes a distributed algorithm for the economic dispatch problem (EDP). It mainly studies the stochastic gradient-push method with asynchronous step-size and noisy gradient to deal with the finite delays in time-varying directed communication network of EDP. The author shows nice mathematical skills in presenting the results. However, the reviewer has to raise some questions about the model and algorithm in this study: 1. Why not to include ramp-up and ramp-down limit constraint for units in the EDP model? Is the proposed algorithm applicable for an EDP model with time coupling constraints? 2. The author should indicate the difference or improvement of the proposed algorithm in this study compared with reference [29]. 3. In introduction, the author mentioned ‘This work adopts asynchronous step-size, which provides a more flexible range for step-size.’ However, the advantage of asynchronous step-size is well displayed in Section 5. 4. Numerical results in Section 5 should be simplified or reorganized. The author can just take one test system to analyze the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in detail (for instance, 4-bus system). Moreover, comparison results between different cases are recommended to present in a table format for a better display. Reviewer 3 I have no further comments. Reviewer 4 The revised paper can be accepted by minor revisions. 1. Please give the name, unit of the vertical coordinates for figures. 2. The literature review is not sufficient. Please refer to：3篇参考文献 爱斯维尔这个这次接收的纪律大吗？？？已经 Decision Pending ！谢谢 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
基金申报
已经有6人回复
-
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有6人回复
-
推荐一本书
已经有13人回复
-
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有5人回复
-
基金委咋了？2026年的指南还没有出来？
已经有9人回复
-
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗？
已经有17人回复
-
纳米粒子粒径的测量
已经有8人回复
-
疑惑？
已经有5人回复
-
计算机、0854电子信息（085401-058412）调剂
已经有5人回复
-
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有5人回复
maplecas
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 10340.4
- 散金: 270
- 红花: 51
- 帖子: 2435
- 在线: 693.8小时
- 虫号: 1561367
- 注册: 2012-01-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 地球化学
2楼2019-05-21 08:45:34
qiluo2007
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 15364.3
- 散金: 842
- 红花: 36
- 帖子: 2154
- 在线: 299.1小时
- 虫号: 2624687
- 注册: 2013-08-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 机械工程
3楼2019-05-21 09:02:51
yuanye2010
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1118.8
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 167
- 在线: 157.9小时
- 虫号: 2548427
- 注册: 2013-07-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电力系统
4楼2019-05-21 17:22:50
yuanye2010
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1118.8
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 167
- 在线: 157.9小时
- 虫号: 2548427
- 注册: 2013-07-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电力系统
5楼2019-05-21 17:23:14
yuanye20106楼2019-05-26 08:24:09
yuanye2010
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1118.8
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 167
- 在线: 157.9小时
- 虫号: 2548427
- 注册: 2013-07-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电力系统
7楼2019-05-26 12:31:52
-knight
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2831.4
- 散金: 76
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 703
- 在线: 85.9小时
- 虫号: 3334687
- 注册: 2014-07-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 动力学与控制
8楼2020-03-09 16:49:01
yuanye2010
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1118.8
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 167
- 在线: 157.9小时
- 虫号: 2548427
- 注册: 2013-07-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电力系统
9楼2020-03-09 19:10:46