| 查看: 2916 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
lkd-syl金虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
拒稿毫无厘头,根本不知道他们要表达什么,感觉还是不要投国内期刊了 已有5人参与
|
||
|
审稿意见:COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: Using First-principles calculations, the present work studied the *** of ****. Based the calculated ****, a number of *** are predicted. The content is within the scope of the journal. And the result is consistent with the literature and helpful for ***. However, in predicting the ***, the theoretical models naturally ignore the ****, e.g., ****. Thus it is important to compare with experiments to justify the theoretical results and avoid potential misunderstanding of the readers. Also, the language should be polished. I therefore suggest a major revision of the manuscript. Reviewer #2: In this paper, *****(摘要里的大致内容). The author's results of calculation can verify some experimntal resuits of *** and guide ****. Here the reviewer has some questions and advices: 1. According some other reports (such as "****" , ***,which is opposite to the results of this paper. Is the result of *** reliable? (这里需要说明的是我论文里结论关于这方面的解释与他提供这个论文的信息是一致的,但是他这么说不一致,我还特意对照了一下,当然审稿人可能就是他提供这篇文章的作者之一)2. In the ****. So does the calculation and prediction of *** in this paper have practical significance? 3. There are also some errors in English grammar, tense inconsistency and ununity in single and plural. For example, there are grammatical errors in"it is obviously can be seen" and "with *** has the minimum".Please check the paper again carefully. 基于上述,编辑给了reject,我感觉总体该给大修啊,目前想申诉,不知道成功几率大不大,因为他说这几点我感觉解释没有问题,语言牙可以润色。 |
» 猜你喜欢
学科评审组评审是指会评吗?
已经有3人回复
面上合作单位盖章
已经有8人回复
面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级?
已经有15人回复
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上)
已经有12人回复
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何
已经有11人回复
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的?
已经有19人回复
基金未中,这种答复是模板吗?
已经有7人回复

柳絮虫
新虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 347 (大学生)
- 金币: 1662.9
- 红花: 69
- 帖子: 3005
- 在线: 315.6小时
- 虫号: 4465824
- 注册: 2016-03-04
- 专业: 植物资源学
6楼2019-05-03 10:23:21
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2019-04-26 22:57:20
研究生笑笑
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3612.8
- 散金: 1650
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1255
- 在线: 52.2小时
- 虫号: 4378225
- 注册: 2016-01-24
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路制造与封装
3楼2019-04-27 11:48:11
qujia001
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6169.1
- 散金: 86
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 904
- 在线: 298.6小时
- 虫号: 1704789
- 注册: 2012-03-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机网络
4楼2019-04-28 09:44:03










, ***,which is opposite to the results of this paper. Is the result of *** reliable? (这里需要说明的是我论文里结论关于这方面的解释与他提供这个论文的信息是一致的,但是他这么说不一致,我还特意对照了一下,当然审稿人可能就是他提供这篇文章的作者之一)
回复此楼
20