| 查看: 3050 | 回复: 6 | |||
lkd-syl金虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
拒稿毫无厘头,根本不知道他们要表达什么,感觉还是不要投国内期刊了 已有5人参与
|
|
审稿意见:COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: Using First-principles calculations, the present work studied the *** of ****. Based the calculated ****, a number of *** are predicted. The content is within the scope of the journal. And the result is consistent with the literature and helpful for ***. However, in predicting the ***, the theoretical models naturally ignore the ****, e.g., ****. Thus it is important to compare with experiments to justify the theoretical results and avoid potential misunderstanding of the readers. Also, the language should be polished. I therefore suggest a major revision of the manuscript. Reviewer #2: In this paper, *****(摘要里的大致内容). The author's results of calculation can verify some experimntal resuits of *** and guide ****. Here the reviewer has some questions and advices: 1. According some other reports (such as "****" , ***,which is opposite to the results of this paper. Is the result of *** reliable? (这里需要说明的是我论文里结论关于这方面的解释与他提供这个论文的信息是一致的,但是他这么说不一致,我还特意对照了一下,当然审稿人可能就是他提供这篇文章的作者之一)2. In the ****. So does the calculation and prediction of *** in this paper have practical significance? 3. There are also some errors in English grammar, tense inconsistency and ununity in single and plural. For example, there are grammatical errors in"it is obviously can be seen" and "with *** has the minimum".Please check the paper again carefully. 基于上述,编辑给了reject,我感觉总体该给大修啊,目前想申诉,不知道成功几率大不大,因为他说这几点我感觉解释没有问题,语言牙可以润色。 |
» 猜你喜欢
论文的挂名怎么评判贡献?基金申请中,排名第一的挂名文章
已经有3人回复
越来越担心硕士毕业后没有竞争力了
已经有13人回复
申博自荐 2篇一区TOP+1篇EI+2公开发明专利 2027博士申请
已经有3人回复
闲聊
已经有6人回复
申博求助
已经有4人回复

|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2019-04-26 22:57:20
研究生笑笑
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3612.8
- 散金: 1650
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1255
- 在线: 52.2小时
- 虫号: 4378225
- 注册: 2016-01-24
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路制造与封装
3楼2019-04-27 11:48:11
qujia001
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6169.1
- 散金: 86
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 904
- 在线: 298.6小时
- 虫号: 1704789
- 注册: 2012-03-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机网络
4楼2019-04-28 09:44:03
5楼2019-04-28 18:48:08
柳絮虫
新虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 347 (大学生)
- 金币: 1662.9
- 红花: 69
- 帖子: 3005
- 在线: 315.6小时
- 虫号: 4465824
- 注册: 2016-03-04
- 专业: 植物资源学
6楼2019-05-03 10:23:21
Zed-jie
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2924.7
- 散金: 1169
- 红花: 21
- 帖子: 2194
- 在线: 272.2小时
- 虫号: 3475453
- 注册: 2014-10-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 固体与表面物理化学
7楼2019-05-03 10:45:15










, ***,which is opposite to the results of this paper. Is the result of *** reliable? (这里需要说明的是我论文里结论关于这方面的解释与他提供这个论文的信息是一致的,但是他这么说不一致,我还特意对照了一下,当然审稿人可能就是他提供这篇文章的作者之一)
回复此楼