24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

曰小天

捐助贵宾 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 49.8
帖子: 96
在线: 26.1小时
虫号: 9635808

[交流] TCSVT 拒稿重投后大修还有机会吗

两个审稿接受最后一个审稿人有问题问题如下：还有机会吗？
Associate Editor
Comments to the Author:
AE: Reviewers #1 & #2 are contented with this revised version, while Reviewer #3 remains a few concerns, especially in the technical aspect. So, we would ask the authors to do a further revision to cater for the requirements of all the reviewers.

Reviewer Comments:

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
The authors resubmitted this paper without a response letter. After carefully checking the content, it seems that the authors have addressed all of my concerns. Therefore, I recommend to accept this paper.

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
The author has addressed my concerns in round-1 review. I think it is in good shape to publish.

Reviewer: 3

Comments to the Author
In this paper, the authors proposed an effective method for detecting double JPEG compression for the color image by using the conversion error, rounding error, and truncation error on the pixel in the spherical coordinate system. It is interesting. I have a few questions.

1. The most serious part is the organization of the paper, especially for the introduction section. It is highly suggested that the “State of the Art” should be split as one individual section, named as related work. Thus the introduction part can be more compact and easy for the reviewers to catch the point.
2. The authors proposed that they fully use three channels for map to spherical coordinates. These seems to be one straightforward extension. I am wondering the effectiveness and novelties.
3. The paper needs to be more carefully revised and reorganized. Some parts seem to be very redundant. For example, the color space conversion in Eq. (1) and (2) are the common knowledge, which should not be included in the paper.
4. The section II and the first part of section III seem to discuss the fore types of errors in color image JPEG compression, which seem to be overlappling. The authors are suggested to reorganize the paper to make it clearer.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2019-04-25 19:06:44

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

凯琳的舞鞋

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 4 (幼儿园)
金币: 88.1
帖子: 293
在线: 209.3小时
虫号: 3758656

★
曰小天(金币+1): 谢谢参与

你要根据审稿人意见修改或者不能改的也要说明原因啊

发自小木虫Android客户端

赞一下

回复此楼

3楼2019-04-25 19:12:10

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

查看全部 23 个回答

曰小天

捐助贵宾 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 49.8
帖子: 96
在线: 26.1小时
虫号: 9635808

主编是这么说的I am writing to you concerning the above referenced manuscript, which you submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

Based on the enclosed set of reviews, I am recommending that the manuscript undergo a MAJOR REVISION and be resubmitted for consideration by the IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

赞一下

回复此楼

2楼2019-04-25 19:07:50

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖