24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 tsktsk123123 的 2 个金币，回帖就立即获得 1 个金币，每人有 1 次机会

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

tsktsk123123

新虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 291
帖子: 445
在线: 87.9小时
虫号: 3725697

[交流] IEEE Access期刊修回意见，修后重投，求帮助！！！

我今天收到IEEE Access期刊的一审意见：修后重投。
说到“最后，在您的求职信中，请注明您是否希望我们将您的文章分配给相同或不同的审稿人，我们将尽力满足您的要求。”
这个应该选择原审稿人？还是重新选择？
因为拒稿的那位审稿人给的意见不是很好修改，只能做详细的解释。而另外那位审稿人没有给任何意见。
我这种修后重投，别录用的概率大吗？解释完之后立刻上传？还是过一周在上传？谢谢！！

审稿人给的意见：
Finally, in your cover letter, please indicate if you would like us to assign your article to the same or different reviewers and we will do our best to accommodate your request.
We sincerely hope you will update your manuscript and resubmit soon. Please contact me if you have any questions.

Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Reject (do not encourage resubmit)
The pipeline design is very similar to the work of [21] (i.e., the hierarchical network design and the random field to optimize the boundary), while the demonstrated results are not superior to that of [21] (their accuracy is 99% plus). The authors did not conduct a comparison with the work of [21]
Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: OK
Is the paper technically sound?: Appears so.
Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: OK
Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: OK

Reviewer: 2
Recommendation: Accept (minor edits)
Comments:
This study compares the work with the state-of-the-art. The study reports high accuracies in the recognition.
Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes
Is the paper technically sound?: YesIs the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes
Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes

回复此楼