| 查看: 1195 | 回复: 3 | ||
[交流]
审稿专家的审稿意见不明白，求大神帮看 已有2人参与
|
|
2. the entire experimental section is missing, but the manuscript reports results obtained from experiments. in this form the results cannot be interpreted and verified without the detailed description of the experimental work. it is essential in the manuscript, because the topic is not the most common thermal analysis. (instrument, sample mass, purge gas... etc. should be specified.) the authors had to read few jtac papers for ideas. 3 the reader do not know much about the thermal program used in the experiments. this must be provided carefully before publication. sci审稿人说我缺实验部分，可是我写了实验，就像国内期刊要求的一样，第三条我没没弄懂啥意思，有大神指点一下的吗 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼
13972033882
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6678.8
- 散金: 300
- 红花: 58
- 帖子: 2621
- 在线: 641.2小时
- 虫号: 3591535
- 注册: 2014-12-12
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境工程
2楼2019-03-15 14:10:32
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
3楼2019-03-15 22:54:51
4楼2019-03-16 08:24:35