| 查看: 2026 | 回复: 8 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者lpllzj将赠送您 40 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
desalination修改稿修回编辑让重投 已有1人参与
|
|||
|
desalination修改意见大修，修改后编辑意见如下： The response from the authors was checked, however while their response to each reviewer comments was made, it was not possible to identify where changes were made (if at all) from each response. It doesn't look like the authors have utilized the reviewer comments to the best possible advantage to improve the quality of their paper. Even the concerns from the reviewers around novelty didn't appear to show any change to point this out more clearly in the paper. Such criticisms should be utilized constructively to improve the paper as much as possible. 这是什么意思？有没有大神知道，是以新的稿件重投还是按照编辑意思修改后继续返回原审稿人进行修改稿审稿？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有49人回复
-
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
-
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有17人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿
已经有22人回复
-
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
-
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有6人回复
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
8楼2019-01-29 23:00:02
zhangjun.025
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2396.3
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 313
- 在线: 138.8小时
- 虫号: 474429
- 注册: 2007-12-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 管理经济学
2楼2019-01-29 20:43:12
3楼2019-01-29 21:01:31
273180219
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
天天虫
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 10471.9
- 散金: 1085
- 红花: 16
- 帖子: 2143
- 在线: 310.6小时
- 虫号: 3508818
- 注册: 2014-10-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 污染控制化学
4楼2019-01-29 21:05:01