| 查看: 2317 | 回复: 18 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
IEEE Transactions on ***
|
|||
|
这个期刊，投稿说我格式有问题，但是我已经严格按照投稿要求修改了啊。 退稿信件说的特别宽泛，大家帮忙分析一下。 We regret to advise you that the Editor is unable to process the subject paper for publication as a PES Transactions paper due to editorial and/or format/quality related issues. Enclosed please find the comments of the Editor(s) that should serve to explain the recommendation of Editorial Rejection for the subject manuscript and possible suggestions for your future actions and considerations. The PES encourages you not to resubmit the paper in its present state. However, you may submit other papers to report new work in the areas of your interest that are within the scope of this journal. Please remember that submitted manuscripts should be prepared according to the PES Author's Kit and the IEEE Transactions template. We thank you for your continued interest in the Power & Energy Society. COMMENTS TO THE AUTHORS: Editor's Comments: The paper is not correctly prepared/formatted and contains many figures of very poor quality. If the authors would like their manuscript to be sent out for a full review, please do the following: 1) Properly position your work within the scope of this journal and its reading audience. It is also expected that the authors clearly explain and demonstrate (e.g. by some comparisons) their contribution and novelty with respect to the state-of-the-art in a given domain of their work, available or existing alternative methods, your own previous publications (if it applies), and relevant published literature. 2) Prepare your paper according to the IEEE PES Authors Kit, format it strictly according to the IEEE Transactions template including all graphics, references, styles, margins, line spaces, title, font sizes, authors’ affiliation, and the mandatory information on the first page left-bottom corner. Please limit the number of pages to 8 for the initial submission by considering material most relevant for your contribution. 3) Please improve the quality, clarity, and consistency of all figures. Avoid putting many sub-figures horizontally within the column, especially when it compromises the quality/clarity. Avoid putting any boxes around figures. It may be better to include fewer figures that clearly demonstrate your approach than clattering your manuscript with too many figures of poor quality. Make sure that all lines, legends, and details are sufficiently large, clearly visible/readable/distinguishable, and consistent throughout the entire manuscript. The smallest allowable font size is 8. All figures with circuits must be drawn using circuit elements of the same size and style. All figures with diagrams also must use the same consistent size and style of blocks and variables. The variables used in your figures must match those used in the text and equations in terms of size and style (italic vs. regular, including all subscripts). This is mandatory. Please understand that the IEEE technical editors have no means to correct or improve your graphics files once they are submitted, and it is the authors’ responsibility to provide the graphics files in the best quality. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
OpenAI又攻克数学难题了，离AI做有机合成还有多远？
已经有10人回复
-
极限拉扯，如何抉择
已经有13人回复
-
课题组会帮你通过考核么？
已经有7人回复
-
入职后第一次管课题组的专利缴费，对账才发现官费比别人多掏了一倍
已经有6人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有10人回复
9楼2019-01-07 18:05:19
3楼2019-01-07 17:01:14
4楼2019-01-07 17:16:36
5楼2019-01-07 17:20:08
简单回复
longwave10楼
2019-01-07 18:55
回复
sipid(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
tzynew8楼
2019-01-07 18:05
回复
sipid(金币+1): 谢谢参与
8 发自小木虫Android客户端
2019-01-07 17:01
回复
sipid(金币+1): 谢谢参与
这 发自小木虫IOS客户端
Sun_10836楼
2019-01-07 17:37
回复
sipid(金币+1): 谢谢参与
1 发自小木虫Android客户端
