应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 原创经验 » IEEE Transactions on ***
51/1返回列表
查看: 1908  |  回复: 18
查看全部回帖@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

sipid

木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] IEEE Transactions on ***

这个期刊，投稿说我格式有问题，但是我已经严格按照投稿要求修改了啊。
退稿信件说的特别宽泛，大家帮忙分析一下。

We regret to advise you that the Editor is unable to process the subject paper for publication as a PES Transactions paper due to editorial and/or format/quality related issues.

Enclosed please find the comments of the Editor(s) that should serve to explain the recommendation of Editorial Rejection for the subject manuscript and possible suggestions for your future actions and considerations.

The PES encourages you not to resubmit the paper in its present state. However, you may submit other papers to report new work in the areas of your interest that are within the scope of this journal. Please remember that submitted manuscripts should be prepared according to the PES Author's Kit and the IEEE Transactions template.

We thank you for your continued interest in the Power & Energy Society.

COMMENTS TO THE AUTHORS:
Editor's Comments:


The paper is not correctly prepared/formatted and contains many figures of very poor quality. If the authors would like their manuscript to be sent out for a full review, please do the following:
1) Properly position your work within the scope of this journal and its reading audience. It is also expected that the authors clearly explain and demonstrate (e.g. by some comparisons) their contribution and novelty with respect to the state-of-the-art in a given domain of their work, available or existing alternative methods, your own previous publications (if it applies), and relevant published literature.
2) Prepare your paper according to the IEEE PES Authors Kit, format it strictly according to the IEEE Transactions template including all graphics, references, styles, margins, line spaces, title, font sizes, authors’ affiliation, and the mandatory information on the first page left-bottom corner. Please limit the number of pages to 8 for the initial submission by considering material most relevant for your contribution.
3) Please improve the quality, clarity, and consistency of all figures. Avoid putting many sub-figures horizontally within the column, especially when it compromises the quality/clarity. Avoid putting any boxes around figures. It may be better to include fewer figures that clearly demonstrate your approach than clattering your manuscript with too many figures of poor quality. Make sure that all lines, legends, and details are sufficiently large, clearly visible/readable/distinguishable, and consistent throughout the entire manuscript. The smallest allowable font size is 8. All figures with circuits must be drawn using circuit elements of the same size and style. All figures with diagrams also must use the same consistent size and style of blocks and variables. The variables used in your figures must match those used in the text and equations in terms of size and style (italic vs. regular, including all subscripts). This is mandatory. Please understand that the IEEE technical editors have no means to correct or improve your graphics files once they are submitted, and it is the authors’ responsibility to provide the graphics files in the best quality.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼2019-01-07 17:00:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sipid

木虫 (著名写手)
引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by edwinyi at 2019-01-07 17:16:36
明显说了1,2,3啊，照着改就是了

第一段说文章是否符合期刊定位及读者，以及创新型怎么样
第二段说格式不对
第三段说图片不清楚。

投了这么多，从来没说图片不清楚的。说格式不对/或者创新型不够，不等于白说。没有具体说那个地方不对啊。我是严格按照格式改的啊。
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2019-01-07 17:20:08
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sipid

木虫 (著名写手)
引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by caowasai at 2019-01-07 18:05:19
很难说，如果是用word写的，可能会因为包含一些奇怪的字体，符号，空格等，转成pdf以后无法通过ieee投稿系统里的格式检查，建议使用latex写

编辑没有明确的细节描述。

发自小木虫Android客户端
赞一下 回复此楼
16楼2019-01-08 14:12:34
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sipid

木虫 (著名写手)
引用回帖:
18楼: Originally posted by caowasai at 2019-01-08 15:27:34
word总会出一些肉眼很难看出来的奇葩问题，所以推荐用latex。IEEE的期刊一向推荐用latex编辑稿件，我身边所有用latex的人，第一次用完都会说，latex排版确实比word漂亮
...

latex我也用过。但是有时候会出现bug。

发自小木虫Android客户端
赞一下 回复此楼
19楼2019-01-08 18:02:50
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 sipid 的主题更新
51/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭