| 查看: 2122 | 回复: 6 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者spurr将赠送您 6 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
主编退回，请教如何回复_International Journal of Food Science and Technology 已有2人参与
|
||
|
各位大神，本人近期投了一篇文章，内容是蛋白酶解制备抗氧化活性肽，主要工艺过程研究，主编大致意见是，缺少没有后续的评价内容，补充后重新投稿，请教大家该如何回复： regarding manuscript id ijfst-2018-xxxx entitled "preparation and characterization of antioxidant peptides from xx protein enzymatic hydrolysate" which you submitted to the international journal of food science and technology: while the aims of your research are topical the relevance to food science is not clear. the investigation reported in this manuscript is at a preliminary stage in that the efficacy of the extracts in food systems is not reported. with further lab work and careful re-writing; much more complete research could be submitted with a much greater chance of acceptance. in its current form if approved for peer review as an original article referees would be unlikely to recommend acceptance. therefore, the editors suggest that you develop your research to prepare a manuscript suitable for approval for peer review. we suggest research papers may be possible along the following line of research: * in vitro digestibility outcomes - the degree to which the extract is likely to retain its bioactivity after human digestion processes; i.e. what is its stability across digestion? * effects as a food ingredient - can the extract can be added as a food ingredient? will it contribute to texture or flavour? will recipe adjustments need to be made in model foods? for example it may contribute to texture in dairy products or preserves different than for high protein foods. * whether and to what extent in vitro effects are observed in rats or replicated in human subjects. if rigorously addressed this research may constitute 2 or more articles. should you address the issues raised the editors would be happy to consider new submission(s). please note that re-submitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your re-submission will be subject to review by the reviewer(s) before a decision is rendered. 请教如何回复邮件，另外，主编提到的3个补充实验都要做吗，还是说只选择性的补充一两点内容？全做的话，要花费大量时间且增加的内容就太多了，感觉超出一篇文章的内容了  文章已有的内容是：蛋白的水解工艺优化（超声辅助），测定不同分子量（超滤截留）的肽段抗氧化活性，活性最强的肽段分子量分布欢迎大家不吝赐教，谢谢~ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
今天系统多次维护，明天很可能放榜！
已经有5人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有74人回复
-
岩土工程学报什么时候才能终审完呐
已经有4人回复
-
时间戳又变了8-15
已经有25人回复
-
2027广东省杰青
已经有6人回复
-
快农历七夕节了，轻松一下，男人悄悄话，女施主请不要进来。
已经有3人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有9人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有26人回复
-
我的国基提前知道中了，可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了，怎么会有这样的人
已经有16人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有12人回复
» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)
5楼2019-07-18 21:27:12
lpl1937
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 42 (小学生)
- 金币: 1251.9
- 散金: 58
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 321
- 在线: 74.9小时
- 虫号: 1687187
- 注册: 2012-03-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 食品科学基础
2楼2018-12-21 17:08:10
3楼2018-12-21 21:57:20
4楼2019-07-07 09:48:41
