| 查看: 4972 | 回复: 15 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
ceramics international已有9人参与
|
|||
|
最近在ceramics international上投了一篇文章，经过一次大修后审稿人认为再次修改后可以接收，修完稿后编辑认为内容已经达到要求，语言存在问题需要进行润色，在我润色完后提交后，编辑直接reject，要求重新投稿，昨天晚上到现在一直是with editor,请各位大神帮我分析分析这是怎么回事？ （第二次审稿意见）The reviewer has commented on your above paper and indicated that it is acceptable for publication with some corrections. I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript carefully addressing the issues raised in the reviewer's comments (included below). Although the scientuific content of the revised paper may be acceptable, language needs to be revised as before advisd to authors. Just two examples from abstract: "The aim of this examination was to discuss.." shall be "The aim of this paper is to discuss".. "as well as an increase in resistant hydrothermal stability with" shall be "as well as an increase in hydrothermal stability with" Authors are again advised to have their paper fully revised for language by an official technical editing agency. （第三次审稿意见）Language has been revised. Now please resubmit the whole revised paper as a new submission without showing corrections in colour. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
博三一直没文章怎么办
已经有12人回复
-
蹲一个男朋友
已经有24人回复
-
又见奇葩学生，可咋办
已经有7人回复
-
河北省基金
已经有17人回复
-
今天才知道硕士考进大专比博士进本科工资高得多
已经有9人回复
-
博士去高校就是为了有寒暑假吗？
已经有20人回复
-
一个审稿人已返回，也没邀请审稿人，也没人审稿中，编辑要闹啥？
已经有12人回复
-
有博导缺学生吗，我可以当牛做马
已经有56人回复
-
申请基金代表性成果
已经有10人回复
-
来用亲身体会，一起说说年轻老师的辛苦
已经有19人回复
2楼2018-12-07 18:12:22
10