| 查看: 1857 | 回复: 5 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者howardloveme将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
哪位大神帮忙看一下审稿人意见，本人英语水平有限，怕误解了意思
|
||
|
咬牙投了一个四区的SCI（英文版）,现在反悔审稿人修改意见，建议大修。怕自己理解的不对，闹了笑话，哪位大神帮帮忙看一下啊，审稿意见如下： 1. The paper claims in the abstract that the results are of "reference value for relevant experimental research," but in that case greater attention needs to be paid to the anticipated accuracy of the results, and the uncertainties. For example, it can be seen in Table I that many more significant figures are quoted than have actually converged as a function of basis set size. The convergence uncertainty should be included in the tables. 这个意见是让我把表格里有效数字少取几位的意思吗？还是要写出误差啊？我这个是纯理论的结果，没有误差可以对比呀？  2. It is not clear how the QED corrections were calculated, or what the uncertainty is in this term. A simple one-electron approximation is used (see discussion at the end of Sect. II), but the authors do not give any details beyond a reference to Bethe and Salpeter's book. What was the actual formula used? It is likely that not more than one significant figure is significant in comparison with experimental data due to (i) screening corrections, (ii) higher-order corrections, and (iii) electron-electron QED corrections (e.g. the Araki-Sucher Q-term) that are not included. In this range of nuclear charge, (Z alpha) is no longer a small parameter. 这个也是让求QED的误差吗？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造课题组 2027级博士研究生招生
已经有6人回复
-
课题组招2027级博士 上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造方向
已经有6人回复
-
师弟论文见刊大半年才想起来申请专利，还能抢救一下吗？
已经有4人回复
-
有机合成以后会不会被AI改变？做科研的虫友怎么看
已经有8人回复
3楼2018-10-23 20:21:07
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2018-10-22 19:08:06
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2018-10-23 22:32:53
5楼2018-10-27 20:38:38