| 查看: 1693 | 回复: 5 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者howardloveme将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||
[求助]
哪位大神帮忙看一下审稿人意见，本人英语水平有限，怕误解了意思
|
||
|
咬牙投了一个四区的SCI（英文版）,现在反悔审稿人修改意见，建议大修。怕自己理解的不对，闹了笑话，哪位大神帮帮忙看一下啊，审稿意见如下： 1. The paper claims in the abstract that the results are of "reference value for relevant experimental research," but in that case greater attention needs to be paid to the anticipated accuracy of the results, and the uncertainties. For example, it can be seen in Table I that many more significant figures are quoted than have actually converged as a function of basis set size. The convergence uncertainty should be included in the tables. 这个意见是让我把表格里有效数字少取几位的意思吗？还是要写出误差啊？我这个是纯理论的结果，没有误差可以对比呀？  2. It is not clear how the QED corrections were calculated, or what the uncertainty is in this term. A simple one-electron approximation is used (see discussion at the end of Sect. II), but the authors do not give any details beyond a reference to Bethe and Salpeter's book. What was the actual formula used? It is likely that not more than one significant figure is significant in comparison with experimental data due to (i) screening corrections, (ii) higher-order corrections, and (iii) electron-electron QED corrections (e.g. the Araki-Sucher Q-term) that are not included. In this range of nuclear charge, (Z alpha) is no longer a small parameter. 这个也是让求QED的误差吗？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文，论文内容以实验为主，投什么期刊合适？
已经有6人回复
-
带资进组求博导收留
已经有10人回复
-
最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章
已经有11人回复
-
需要合成515-64-0，50g，能接单的留言
已经有3人回复
-
中科院杭州医学所招收博士生一名（生物分析化学、药物递送）
已经有3人回复
-
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名
已经有8人回复
-
想换工作。大多数高校都是 评职称时 认可5年内在原单位取得的成果吗？
已经有4人回复
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2018-10-22 19:08:06
3楼2018-10-23 20:21:07
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2018-10-23 22:32:53
5楼2018-10-27 20:38:38
6楼2018-11-18 03:07:57