| 查看: 1669 | 回复: 5 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者howardloveme将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||
[求助]
哪位大神帮忙看一下审稿人意见，本人英语水平有限，怕误解了意思
|
||
|
咬牙投了一个四区的SCI（英文版）,现在反悔审稿人修改意见，建议大修。怕自己理解的不对，闹了笑话，哪位大神帮帮忙看一下啊，审稿意见如下： 1. The paper claims in the abstract that the results are of "reference value for relevant experimental research," but in that case greater attention needs to be paid to the anticipated accuracy of the results, and the uncertainties. For example, it can be seen in Table I that many more significant figures are quoted than have actually converged as a function of basis set size. The convergence uncertainty should be included in the tables. 这个意见是让我把表格里有效数字少取几位的意思吗？还是要写出误差啊？我这个是纯理论的结果，没有误差可以对比呀？  2. It is not clear how the QED corrections were calculated, or what the uncertainty is in this term. A simple one-electron approximation is used (see discussion at the end of Sect. II), but the authors do not give any details beyond a reference to Bethe and Salpeter's book. What was the actual formula used? It is likely that not more than one significant figure is significant in comparison with experimental data due to (i) screening corrections, (ii) higher-order corrections, and (iii) electron-electron QED corrections (e.g. the Araki-Sucher Q-term) that are not included. In this range of nuclear charge, (Z alpha) is no longer a small parameter. 这个也是让求QED的误差吗？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗
已经有7人回复
-
申请2026年博士
已经有5人回复
-
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有5人回复
-
寻求一种能扛住强氧化性腐蚀性的容器密封件
已经有6人回复
-
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有7人回复
-
请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗
已经有6人回复
-
Bioresource Technology期刊，第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了
已经有7人回复
-
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。
已经有4人回复
-
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢
已经有5人回复
-
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2018-10-22 19:08:06
3楼2018-10-23 20:21:07
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2018-10-23 22:32:53
5楼2018-10-27 20:38:38
6楼2018-11-18 03:07:57