| 查看: 1717 | 回复: 5 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者howardloveme将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||
[求助]
哪位大神帮忙看一下审稿人意见，本人英语水平有限，怕误解了意思
|
||
|
咬牙投了一个四区的SCI（英文版）,现在反悔审稿人修改意见，建议大修。怕自己理解的不对，闹了笑话，哪位大神帮帮忙看一下啊，审稿意见如下： 1. The paper claims in the abstract that the results are of "reference value for relevant experimental research," but in that case greater attention needs to be paid to the anticipated accuracy of the results, and the uncertainties. For example, it can be seen in Table I that many more significant figures are quoted than have actually converged as a function of basis set size. The convergence uncertainty should be included in the tables. 这个意见是让我把表格里有效数字少取几位的意思吗？还是要写出误差啊？我这个是纯理论的结果，没有误差可以对比呀？  2. It is not clear how the QED corrections were calculated, or what the uncertainty is in this term. A simple one-electron approximation is used (see discussion at the end of Sect. II), but the authors do not give any details beyond a reference to Bethe and Salpeter's book. What was the actual formula used? It is likely that not more than one significant figure is significant in comparison with experimental data due to (i) screening corrections, (ii) higher-order corrections, and (iii) electron-electron QED corrections (e.g. the Araki-Sucher Q-term) that are not included. In this range of nuclear charge, (Z alpha) is no longer a small parameter. 这个也是让求QED的误差吗？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
“人文社科而论，许多学术研究还没有达到民国时期的水平”
已经有6人回复
-
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有16人回复
-
版面费该交吗
已经有13人回复
-
面上可以超过30页吧？
已经有6人回复
-
网上报道青年教师午睡中猝死、熬夜猝死的越来越多，主要哪些原因引起的？
已经有4人回复
-
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有10人回复
-
什么是人一生最重要的？
已经有4人回复
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2018-10-22 19:08:06
3楼2018-10-23 20:21:07
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2018-10-23 22:32:53
5楼2018-10-27 20:38:38
6楼2018-11-18 03:07:57