| 查看: 2184 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
投稿被拒，心塞塞，请各位看一下审稿意见已有5人参与
|
|||
|
COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: I have some comments: 1. The paper generally seems to be well-organized, in particular, the problem description reveals some interesting aspects of the infinite-capacity M/M/1 queuing system with working breakdowns and impatience customers. 2. I however find that the focus of this manuscript is to use the mathematical analytic method to solve some performance measures of M/M/1 queuing system with working breakdowns and impatience customers. But the infinite-capacity M/M/1 queuing system mentioned by this manuscript can be easily simulated by SimEvents module on Simulink platform of Matlab software. I therefore suggest the authors to improve some presentation on the superiority of the mathematical analytic method compared with the simulation method. Reviewer #2: Review reports on "Analysis of Impatient Customers in Repairable Queue with Working Breakdowns" (JORC-D-18-00080) This paper analyzes a queueing system with impatient customers and repairable server. The performance measures are given with numerical examples to be provided. After reading the paper, my general assessment is that it bellows the basic requirement for publication. Hence, I have to recommend rejection. My major concerns are mainly focused on the following two aspects. 1) The paper is full of grammar errors and typos. It does not fit the general (even minimum) requirement for publication. So, I suggest the authors to thoroughly improve the English writing. 2) The technique of analysis is rather standard. The research motivation needs to be more focused. What is the highlight of the paper in terms of scientific significance? Is it a new technique, or does it provide new observations in academic significance or practical application? I am not requiring so many highlights for a paper to be published in JORC, but provide one (or two) point(s) being OK. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
基金委治打招呼顽疾越治越严重
已经有28人回复
-
矿大本-中科大硕（推免）-24年科研助理求职-方向不限
已经有7人回复
-
面上项目代表作必须有通讯作者文章吗？
已经有33人回复
-
数理口函评了吗？多大比例呀
已经有20人回复
-
再谈一作和二作
已经有24人回复
-
齿球形催化剂的尺寸
已经有5人回复
-
或许不关于爱情的
已经有56人回复
-
学生家长私下联系老师修改成绩不成，唆使19名学生联名要求复核成绩
已经有8人回复
-
河南工业大学过年开学后，就不让用国基金报账，这合法合规吗？
已经有27人回复
-
相比过去，现在高校导师水平越来越高(可见招聘条件)，研究生越来越差
已经有10人回复
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2018-10-22 17:10:15
2楼2018-10-22 16:53:25
903279943
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2165.4
- 散金: 4634
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 1731
- 在线: 382.3小时
- 虫号: 1488805
- 注册: 2011-11-12
- 专业: 环境地球化学
3楼2018-10-22 17:08:00
5楼2018-10-22 17:12:08
100